PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
(no name)
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in (no name), comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 24, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of UTES

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the (no name) returned 7.57% Year-To-Date and 12.45% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
(no name)
0.35%-1.97%7.57%7.21%21.31%18.22%14.38%12.45%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.11%-4.01%-3.55%-1.41%23.49%18.47%11.96%14.19%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
0.19%-2.87%1.09%3.21%17.65%11.91%9.51%9.56%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
0.55%-4.61%7.09%6.89%4.60%7.52%7.37%7.77%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.25%-2.80%2.82%-4.08%29.07%23.49%16.66%13.01%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
0.24%0.05%14.49%17.07%25.35%17.28%13.92%11.52%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
0.77%0.78%22.30%20.31%23.17%28.16%24.37%14.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 25, 2015, (no name)'s average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.06%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.5 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +12.7%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -16.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, (no name) closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +9.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -10.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.69%6.73%-3.03%0.24%7.57%
20253.12%1.92%-1.26%-0.06%4.11%2.43%1.54%1.25%1.30%-1.39%3.04%-1.39%15.42%
20240.04%2.88%5.00%-1.91%5.13%-0.25%4.08%3.89%3.36%-0.48%6.87%-5.57%24.78%
20233.21%-3.39%2.19%2.06%-4.06%4.64%2.95%-2.91%-3.60%-1.48%6.61%3.48%9.32%
2022-0.29%-0.13%5.58%-3.61%2.22%-7.41%6.31%-1.87%-9.42%8.38%5.89%-3.79%0.08%
2021-0.69%1.44%8.00%4.20%2.14%-0.04%1.14%1.68%-2.72%5.04%-2.70%6.78%26.38%

Benchmark Metrics

Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 3.12%, beta of 0.74, and R² of 0.77 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 25, 2015.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (80.15%) than losses (73.87%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.12% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
3.12%
Beta
0.74
0.77
Upside Capture
80.15%
Downside Capture
73.87%

Expense Ratio

(no name) has an expense ratio of 0.32%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

(no name) ranks 79 for risk / return — better than 79% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


(no name) Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
(no name) Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
(no name) Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
(no name) Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
(no name) Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
(no name) Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

0.88

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

1.37

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

1.39

+5.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.23

6.43

+20.79


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
530.981.491.231.537.13
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
761.532.091.312.679.20
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
190.350.611.070.511.24
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
501.051.471.201.844.55
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
681.452.021.281.867.44
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
420.971.291.201.294.00

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

(no name) Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.46
  • 5-Year: 1.11
  • 10-Year: 0.81
  • All Time: 0.82

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of (no name) compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

(no name) provided a 2.40% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.40%2.61%2.77%3.15%2.93%3.03%3.61%3.01%3.22%2.95%3.20%2.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
1.90%1.93%2.28%2.56%2.56%2.29%2.72%2.34%2.65%2.42%2.82%2.25%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.14%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.46%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.64%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.10%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the (no name). A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the (no name) was 38.02%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 174 trading sessions.

The current (no name) drawdown is 2.80%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-38.02%Feb 21, 202022Mar 23, 2020174Nov 24, 2020196
-16.3%Apr 21, 2022124Oct 12, 2022300Dec 13, 2023424
-13.38%Sep 21, 201867Dec 24, 201838Feb 19, 2019105
-13.21%Oct 23, 201562Jan 20, 201640Mar 17, 2016102
-11.53%Feb 20, 202534Apr 8, 202527May 16, 202561

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 6.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkUTESMLPXVDCZLB.TOFDLVOOPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.380.500.570.640.671.000.79
UTES0.381.000.300.460.410.420.380.63
MLPX0.500.301.000.330.500.590.500.75
VDC0.570.460.331.000.540.670.570.71
ZLB.TO0.640.410.500.541.000.580.640.77
FDL0.670.420.590.670.581.000.670.83
VOO1.000.380.500.570.640.671.000.79
Portfolio0.790.630.750.710.770.830.791.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 25, 2015