Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | Technology Equities | 50% |
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | Global Equities | 50% |
Find the right asset allocation for test 1
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 6, 2026, the test 1 returned 14.84% Year-To-Date and 19.11% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | -2.64% | -0.21% | 7.86% | 7.47% | 23.05% | 19.90% | 11.79% | 13.33% |
Portfolio test 1 | -2.63% | 2.52% | 14.84% | 14.92% | 36.82% | 28.19% | 17.79% | 19.11% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | -1.73% | 0.45% | 9.52% | 10.50% | 25.81% | 20.23% | 10.74% | 12.24% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | -3.37% | 4.35% | 19.34% | 18.44% | 47.15% | 35.54% | 24.42% | 25.82% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 6, 2011, test 1's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.30%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.5 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Dec 2013 with a return of +36.0%, while the worst month was Jan 2014 at -27.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.
On a daily basis, test 1 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Dec 31, 2013 with a return of +33.4%, while the worst single day was Jan 2, 2014 at -25.1%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | -0.85% | -7.36% | 15.42% | 10.98% | -2.40% | 14.84% | ||||||
| 2025 | 0.88% | -3.47% | -6.35% | 1.45% | 9.23% | 7.70% | 3.73% | 0.98% | 5.04% | 4.79% | -2.47% | 1.28% | 23.96% |
| 2024 | 2.72% | 5.10% | 3.22% | -3.48% | 5.13% | 7.93% | -1.03% | 1.03% | 2.66% | -0.50% | 3.98% | -0.16% | 29.39% |
| 2023 | 7.75% | -1.32% | 6.49% | 0.72% | 5.72% | 5.59% | 3.45% | -1.37% | -5.31% | -2.69% | 10.82% | 5.57% | 40.03% |
| 2022 | -7.41% | -2.58% | 3.43% | -8.84% | -2.50% | -8.45% | 8.76% | -3.99% | -9.05% | 4.52% | 5.02% | -3.93% | -23.96% |
| 2021 | -0.22% | 1.88% | 2.19% | 4.73% | 0.44% | 3.91% | 2.02% | 3.07% | -4.26% | 5.26% | 1.92% | 3.59% | 27.04% |
Benchmark Metrics
test 1 has an annualized alpha of 8.55%, beta of 0.66, and R2 of 0.14 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 06, 2011.
- This portfolio captured 117.36% of S&P 500 Index gains and 115.72% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- Beta of 0.66 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.14 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R2 of 0.14 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 8.55%
- Beta
- 0.66
- R²
- 0.14
- Upside Capture
- 117.36%
- Downside Capture
- 115.72%
Expense Ratio
test 1 has an expense ratio of 0.30%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
test 1 ranks 73 for risk / return — better than 73% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for test 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.01 | +0.39 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.33 | 2.71 | +0.62 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.69 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 12.34 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 72 | 2.16 | 3.16 | 1.39 | 2.81 | 12.18 |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 69 | 2.33 | 3.08 | 1.38 | 2.76 | 8.40 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the test 1 was 32.86%, occurring on Oct 9, 2013. Recovery took 307 trading sessions.
The current test 1 drawdown is 1.97%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 bear market2013 | -32.86%Oct 2013 | 3mo 22d | 1y 2mo | 1y 6moJun 2013 - Dec 2014 |
COVID crash2020 | -32.25%Mar 2020 | 1mo 4d | 3mo 22d | 4mo 26dFeb 2020 - Jul 2020 |
Bear market2022 | -31.08%Oct 2022 | 9mo 14d | 9mo 11d | 1y 6moDec 2021 - Jul 2023 |
2016 bear market2016 | -30.36%Feb 2016 | 1y 1mo | 1y 3mo | 2y 5moDec 2014 - Jun 2017 |
2025 selloff2025 | -21.61%Apr 2025 | 1mo 16d | 1mo 28d | 3mo 14dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.23 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.23, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
test 1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2011 | 0.63 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. ACWL.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.64, while XLKQ.L has the lowest at 0.59.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what test 1 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where test 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification