PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
test 1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


XLKQ.L 50.00%ACWL.L 50.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for test 1

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 6, 2026, the test 1 returned 14.84% Year-To-Date and 19.11% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-2.64%-0.21%7.86%7.47%23.05%19.90%11.79%13.33%
Portfolio
test 1
-2.63%2.52%14.84%14.92%36.82%28.19%17.79%19.11%
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
-1.73%0.45%9.52%10.50%25.81%20.23%10.74%12.24%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
-3.37%4.35%19.34%18.44%47.15%35.54%24.42%25.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 6, 2011, test 1's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.30%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.5 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Dec 2013 with a return of +36.0%, while the worst month was Jan 2014 at -27.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, test 1 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Dec 31, 2013 with a return of +33.4%, while the worst single day was Jan 2, 2014 at -25.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.00%-0.85%-7.36%15.42%10.98%-2.40%14.84%
20250.88%-3.47%-6.35%1.45%9.23%7.70%3.73%0.98%5.04%4.79%-2.47%1.28%23.96%
20242.72%5.10%3.22%-3.48%5.13%7.93%-1.03%1.03%2.66%-0.50%3.98%-0.16%29.39%
20237.75%-1.32%6.49%0.72%5.72%5.59%3.45%-1.37%-5.31%-2.69%10.82%5.57%40.03%
2022-7.41%-2.58%3.43%-8.84%-2.50%-8.45%8.76%-3.99%-9.05%4.52%5.02%-3.93%-23.96%
2021-0.22%1.88%2.19%4.73%0.44%3.91%2.02%3.07%-4.26%5.26%1.92%3.59%27.04%

Benchmark Metrics

test 1 has an annualized alpha of 8.55%, beta of 0.66, and R2 of 0.14 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 06, 2011.

  • This portfolio captured 117.36% of S&P 500 Index gains and 115.72% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • Beta of 0.66 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.14 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R2 of 0.14 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
8.55%
Beta
0.66
0.14
Upside Capture
117.36%
Downside Capture
115.72%

Expense Ratio

test 1 has an expense ratio of 0.30%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

test 1 ranks 73 for risk / return — better than 73% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


test 1 Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
test 1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
test 1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
test 1 Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
test 1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
test 1 Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for test 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.01

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.71

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.69

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

12.34

+0.11


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
722.163.161.392.8112.18
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
692.333.081.382.768.40

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

test 1 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.39
  • 5-Year: 0.89
  • 10-Year: 1.01
  • All Time: 0.45

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.64 to 2.53, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of test 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield


test 1 doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the test 1 was 32.86%, occurring on Oct 9, 2013. Recovery took 307 trading sessions.

The current test 1 drawdown is 1.97%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2013 bear market2013
-32.86%Oct 2013
3mo 22d1y 2mo
1y 6moJun 2013 - Dec 2014
COVID crash2020
-32.25%Mar 2020
1mo 4d3mo 22d
4mo 26dFeb 2020 - Jul 2020
Bear market2022
-31.08%Oct 2022
9mo 14d9mo 11d
1y 6moDec 2021 - Jul 2023
2016 bear market2016
-30.36%Feb 2016
1y 1mo1y 3mo
2y 5moDec 2014 - Jun 2017
2025 selloff2025
-21.61%Apr 2025
1mo 16d1mo 28d
3mo 14dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.05

1.09

1.07

1.06

1.23

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.23, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

test 1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

test 1 has a 0.68 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2011

0.63


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. ACWL.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.64, while XLKQ.L has the lowest at 0.59.

XLKQ.L
0.59
ACWL.L
0.64

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. test 1. XLKQ.L has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.96, while ACWL.L has the lowest at 0.94.

ACWL.L
0.94
XLKQ.L
0.96

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

XLKQ.LACWL.L
XLKQ.L1.000.82
ACWL.L0.821.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 6, 2011
Diversification Analysis

Find what test 1 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where test 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification