Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | Nasdaq-100 | 60% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | Gold, Precious Metals, Commodities | 40% |
Find the right asset allocation for CNX1 60 SGLN 40
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of £10,000 in CNX1 60 SGLN 40, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 6, 2026, the CNX1 60 SGLN 40 returned 12.00% Year-To-Date and 19.59% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.00% | 1.99% | 8.95% | 7.70% | 24.78% | 17.43% | 13.11% | 14.18% |
Portfolio CNX1 60 SGLN 40 | -0.13% | 0.35% | 12.00% | 11.64% | 37.46% | 26.96% | 19.47% | 19.59% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.16% | 3.85% | 17.33% | 15.28% | 38.06% | 24.63% | 18.10% | 22.21% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.06% | -6.00% | 1.38% | 3.07% | 31.70% | 27.57% | 19.24% | 13.68% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 11, 2011, CNX1 60 SGLN 40's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.23%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.7 years.
Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Jun 2016 with a return of +11.5%, while the worst month was Apr 2011 at -14.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, CNX1 60 SGLN 40 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 16, 2023 with a return of +24.7%, while the worst single day was Nov 17, 2023 at -19.6%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.82% | 2.44% | -7.10% | 7.05% | 7.62% | -2.54% | 12.00% | ||||||
| 2025 | 5.32% | -3.86% | -2.83% | 0.02% | 4.59% | 2.10% | 5.93% | -0.35% | 8.08% | 7.17% | 0.21% | -0.42% | 28.22% |
| 2024 | 1.10% | 2.98% | 4.39% | 0.37% | 1.10% | 5.73% | -1.53% | -0.68% | 1.92% | 5.68% | 3.03% | 1.69% | 28.69% |
| 2023 | 6.42% | -0.20% | 6.04% | -1.00% | 6.22% | 0.42% | 2.15% | 0.12% | -0.95% | 1.51% | 2.92% | 3.74% | 30.57% |
| 2022 | -6.35% | 1.03% | 5.98% | -3.71% | -4.44% | 9.42% | -6.21% | 1.28% | -1.93% | -2.97% | -0.50% | -2.82% | -11.78% |
| 2021 | -0.55% | -4.38% | 1.30% | 4.71% | -0.46% | 3.43% | 2.20% | 3.32% | -2.05% | 2.58% | 5.02% | 0.08% | 15.80% |
Benchmark Metrics
CNX1 60 SGLN 40 has an annualized alpha of 11.27%, beta of 0.39, and R2 of 0.16 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 11, 2011.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (79.50%) than losses (48.43%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- Beta of 0.39 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.16 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
- R2 of 0.16 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 11.27%
- Beta
- 0.39
- R²
- 0.16
- Upside Capture
- 79.50%
- Downside Capture
- 48.43%
Expense Ratio
CNX1 60 SGLN 40 has an expense ratio of 0.26%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
CNX1 60 SGLN 40 ranks 76 for risk / return — better than 76% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNX1 60 SGLN 40 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.14 | +0.58 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 2.78 | +0.74 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.10 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.76 | 11.53 | +4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 78 | 2.55 | 3.39 | 1.45 | 3.44 | 10.12 |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 40 | 1.35 | 1.78 | 1.27 | 1.75 | 4.61 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the CNX1 60 SGLN 40. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the CNX1 60 SGLN 40 was 20.34%, occurring on Dec 4, 2023. Recovery took 215 trading sessions.
The current CNX1 60 SGLN 40 drawdown is 2.52%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 bear market2023 | -20.34%Dec 2023 | 17d | 10mo 12d | 10mo 29dNov 2023 - Oct 2024 |
2011 correction2011 | -17.31%Jun 2011 | 2mo 3d | 8mo 14d | 10mo 17dApr 2011 - Feb 2012 |
Bear market2022 | -16.08%Dec 2022 | 6mo 4d | 4mo 29d | 11mo 3dJun 2022 - May 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -14.28%Apr 2025 | 1mo 25d | 3mo 4d | 4mo 29dFeb 2025 - Jul 2025 |
Bear market2022 | -13.18%Jun 2022 | 6mo 26d | 7d | 7mo 3dNov 2021 - Jun 2022 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.35 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.28 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.28, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
CNX1 60 SGLN 40 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2011 | 0.51 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. CNX1.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.59, while SGLN.L has the lowest at 0.06.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what CNX1 60 SGLN 40 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where CNX1 60 SGLN 40 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification