PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S&P beaters
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ORLY 25.00%KLAC 25.00%APH 25.00%MOD 25.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for S&P beaters

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in S&P beaters, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every month.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 9, 2026, the S&P beaters returned 42.83% Year-To-Date and 35.82% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
S&P beaters
2.66%4.90%42.83%34.39%93.32%62.16%47.59%35.82%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
3.45%12.16%6.47%2.93%54.90%55.57%34.64%26.67%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
9.27%12.92%73.94%72.59%162.58%66.83%47.83%42.36%
MOD
Modine Manufacturing Company
-0.46%0.82%106.15%78.85%193.99%104.57%73.77%39.33%
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
-1.45%-4.24%-2.40%-9.27%-3.08%13.76%20.39%17.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 23, 1993, S&P beaters's average daily return is +0.11%, while the average monthly return is +2.19%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.7 years.

Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Mar 2009 with a return of +38.7%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -26.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, S&P beaters closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 23, 2009 with a return of +16.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -14.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
202617.88%7.04%-5.55%15.81%1.65%1.80%42.83%
20253.97%-4.87%-2.66%6.40%8.19%8.87%12.51%2.14%11.45%5.04%3.02%-7.09%55.37%
20246.85%15.06%4.52%-2.39%6.02%4.88%4.97%2.01%0.65%-5.61%7.30%-6.54%42.29%
20235.61%0.29%1.99%-3.03%11.06%12.31%5.05%6.73%-5.13%-3.25%14.94%8.48%67.69%
2022-8.84%-1.30%-0.25%-10.41%16.77%-8.31%18.95%-0.33%-8.36%18.80%12.97%-4.44%19.94%
2021-0.56%6.91%7.92%4.03%1.34%1.02%5.27%-5.79%-2.98%3.79%2.89%5.64%32.62%

Benchmark Metrics

S&P beaters has an annualized alpha of 15.41%, beta of 1.20, and R2 of 0.55 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 23, 1993.

  • This portfolio captured 182.15% of S&P 500 Index gains and 106.68% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 15.41% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
15.41%
Beta
1.20
0.55
Upside Capture
182.15%
Downside Capture
106.68%

Expense Ratio

S&P beaters has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

S&P beaters ranks 89 for risk / return — in the top 89% of Portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


S&P beaters Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
S&P beaters Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S&P beaters Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
S&P beaters Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
S&P beaters Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
S&P beaters Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P beaters and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

3.05

1.94

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.59

2.63

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.00

2.59

+5.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.63

11.84

+12.78


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
APH
Amphenol Corporation
761.351.791.251.965.07
KLAC
KLA Corporation
953.433.381.497.3023.22
MOD
Modine Manufacturing Company
932.943.191.427.0920.47
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
34-0.13-0.031.00-0.15-0.29

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

S&P beaters Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 3.05
  • 5-Year: 1.62
  • 10-Year: 1.25
  • All Time: 0.83

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.60 to 2.47, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of S&P beaters compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

S&P beaters provided a 0.24% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.24%0.29%0.44%0.50%0.58%0.45%0.54%0.66%1.06%0.74%0.88%0.99%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.38%0.61%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%
MOD
Modine Manufacturing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the S&P beaters. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the S&P beaters was 69.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 201 trading sessions.

The current S&P beaters drawdown is 2.91%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-69.30%Mar 2009
1y 7mo9mo 18d
2y 5moJul 2007 - Dec 2009
COVID crash2020
-45.62%Mar 2020
4mo 16d4mo 18d
9mo 4dNov 2019 - Aug 2020
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-43.88%Oct 2002
7mo 2d10mo 15d
1y 5moMar 2002 - Aug 2003
1998 bear market1998
-34.45%Aug 1998
6mo 5d4mo 7d
10mo 12dFeb 1998 - Jan 1999
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-31.67%Sep 2001
1mo 18d2mo 17d
4mo 5dAug 2001 - Dec 2001

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.45

1.35

1.34

1.35

1.44

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.44, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

S&P beaters correlation to the S&P 500 Index

S&P beaters has a 0.69 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1993

0.69


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. KLAC has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.57, while ORLY has the lowest at 0.40.

ORLY
0.40
MOD
0.49
APH
0.56
KLAC
0.57

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P beaters. KLAC has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.75, while ORLY has the lowest at 0.52.

ORLY
0.52
APH
0.69
MOD
0.70
KLAC
0.75

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

ORLYMODKLACAPH
ORLY1.000.250.240.27
MOD0.251.000.330.38
KLAC0.240.331.000.46
APH0.270.380.461.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Apr 23, 1993
Diversification Analysis

Find what S&P beaters is missing

See which holdings overlap, where S&P beaters is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification