PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
nvdayyds
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


NVDA 48.05%COST 26.84%QQQ 19.87%AAPL 5.24%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for nvdayyds

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in nvdayyds, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the nvdayyds returned 13.95% Year-To-Date and 46.94% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%-0.17%8.56%8.85%22.93%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
nvdayyds
0.28%-5.77%13.95%16.62%30.66%48.91%43.41%46.94%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-1.52%-2.59%7.29%4.81%46.73%17.21%18.59%29.36%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.68%-4.91%14.24%11.38%-1.48%25.12%22.12%22.27%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.16%-9.03%10.16%17.38%41.70%71.13%63.13%67.95%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.59%0.93%17.57%17.85%35.82%26.43%16.85%21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Mar 10, 1999, nvdayyds's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.72%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.2 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was May 2003 with a return of +44.6%, while the worst month was Jun 2002 at -25.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 13 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 8 months.

On a daily basis, nvdayyds closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 7, 2000 with a return of +18.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 14, 2000 at -19.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.67%-1.70%-2.02%11.02%4.54%-1.67%13.95%
2025-3.04%3.47%-10.90%1.69%14.18%8.73%5.21%-0.14%4.69%5.02%-6.39%0.73%22.92%
202413.23%17.76%7.83%-3.32%18.00%9.42%-3.44%3.66%1.23%3.76%6.25%-2.56%95.38%
202322.10%8.70%13.96%0.55%19.68%9.04%7.01%1.85%-6.81%-4.03%11.78%7.67%132.80%
2022-12.82%-0.62%9.81%-20.57%-4.28%-9.98%16.48%-10.33%-14.36%8.47%15.44%-13.20%-36.69%
2021-1.96%0.74%0.59%9.15%4.06%14.80%2.05%9.60%-5.38%15.74%17.68%-3.83%79.56%

Benchmark Metrics

nvdayyds has an annualized alpha of 24.84%, beta of 1.29, and R2 of 0.46 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since March 10, 1999.

  • This portfolio captured 247.38% of S&P 500 Index gains and 117.99% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • R2 of 0.46 means the benchmark explains less than half of this portfolio's behavior - treat beta with caution or consider switching to a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
24.84%
Beta
1.29
0.46
Upside Capture
247.38%
Downside Capture
117.99%

Expense Ratio

nvdayyds has an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

nvdayyds ranks 29 for risk / return — below 29% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


nvdayyds Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
nvdayyds Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
nvdayyds Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
nvdayyds Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
nvdayyds Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
nvdayyds Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for nvdayyds and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.86

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.53

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.53

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

11.37

-4.55


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
88
2.072.931.383.408.47
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
37
-0.080.021.00-0.10-0.22
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
75
1.201.751.212.074.94
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
71
2.092.731.373.0111.22

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

The current nvdayyds Sharpe ratio is 1.56 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of nvdayyds compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

nvdayyds provided a 0.31% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.31%0.28%0.28%0.94%0.45%0.28%1.11%0.56%0.79%1.67%0.82%1.96%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the nvdayyds. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the nvdayyds was 71.01%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 773 trading sessions.

The current nvdayyds drawdown is 8.16%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Dot-com crash2000–2002
-71.01%Oct 2002
9mo 8d3y 25d
3y 10moJan 2002 - Nov 2005
Financial crisis2007–2009
-67.98%Nov 2008
1y 28d2y 2mo
3y 3moOct 2007 - Feb 2011
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-48.40%Dec 2000
9mo 12d5mo 2d
1y 2moMar 2000 - May 2001
Bear market2022
-47.87%Oct 2022
10mo 18d7mo 13d
1y 5moNov 2021 - May 2023
Dot-com crash2000–2002
-39.75%Oct 2001
3mo 26d1mo 8d
5mo 4dJun 2001 - Nov 2001

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.90, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.36

1.19

1.15

1.14

1.20

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.20, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

nvdayyds correlation to the S&P 500 Index

nvdayyds has a 0.69 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.69


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. QQQ has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.87, while COST has the lowest at 0.54.

COST
0.54
NVDA
0.56
AAPL
0.58
QQQ
0.87

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. nvdayyds. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.95, while COST has the lowest at 0.50.

COST
0.50
AAPL
0.54
QQQ
0.77
NVDA
0.95

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

COSTAAPLNVDAQQQ
COST1.000.340.300.49
AAPL0.341.000.430.67
NVDA0.300.431.000.65
QQQ0.490.670.651.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Mar 10, 1999
Diversification Analysis

Find what nvdayyds is missing

See which holdings overlap, where nvdayyds is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification