Gambling cuz why not

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Gambling cuz why not, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.

As of Apr 3, 2026, the Gambling cuz why not returned -2.74% Year-To-Date and 31.48% of annualized return in the last 10 years.

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Aug 7, 2009, Gambling cuz why not's average daily return is +0.12%, while the average monthly return is +2.41%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.4 years.

Historically, 71% of months were positive and 29% were negative. The best month was Oct 2022 with a return of +17.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -17.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 13 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Gambling cuz why not closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +10.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -14.1%.

Gambling cuz why not has an annualized alpha of 16.67%, beta of 1.08, and R² of 0.78 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since August 07, 2009.

• This portfolio captured 152.64% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 67.88% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
• This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 16.67% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
• With beta of 1.08 and R² of 0.78, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Gambling cuz why not has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.

Gambling cuz why not ranks 62 for risk / return — better than 62% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Gambling cuz why not Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

• 1-Year: 1.32
• 5-Year: 1.51
• 10-Year: 1.45
• All Time: 1.47

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Gambling cuz why not compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.

Gambling cuz why not provided a 0.79% dividend yield over the last twelve months.

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Gambling cuz why not. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Gambling cuz why not was 37.00%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 95 trading sessions.

The current Gambling cuz why not drawdown is 7.79%.

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.