PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
(Review) Growth Value
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for (Review) Growth Value

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in (Review) Growth Value, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every year.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 9, 2026, the (Review) Growth Value returned 8.96% Year-To-Date and 14.28% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
(Review) Growth Value
0.35%0.51%8.96%9.20%22.96%19.60%11.61%14.28%
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
1.13%-1.06%6.44%7.52%11.82%10.54%3.87%8.09%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
0.16%0.48%11.45%12.14%24.85%15.60%7.78%10.50%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
0.25%2.67%11.91%13.41%25.49%17.72%11.30%12.42%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.33%-0.73%6.14%5.11%23.11%24.71%14.33%17.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Aug 5, 2005, (Review) Growth Value's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.94%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 6.2 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +12.6%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -18.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, (Review) Growth Value closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +10.7%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.36%0.48%-5.45%9.15%4.30%-1.58%8.96%
20253.32%-1.57%-5.36%-0.61%6.00%4.62%1.46%2.69%2.93%1.49%0.38%0.28%16.21%
20240.66%5.11%3.38%-4.51%4.77%2.35%2.28%2.18%1.76%-1.31%6.25%-3.49%20.55%
20237.74%-2.35%2.55%0.99%0.20%6.81%3.55%-2.20%-4.97%-2.64%9.58%5.64%26.49%
2022-5.91%-2.17%2.84%-8.50%0.26%-8.64%9.16%-3.98%-9.40%8.50%6.11%-5.53%-18.05%
2021-0.38%3.63%3.96%4.94%1.13%1.66%1.37%2.71%-4.25%6.27%-1.53%4.01%25.63%

Benchmark Metrics

(Review) Growth Value has an annualized alpha of 1.51%, beta of 1.00, and R2 of 0.98 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since August 05, 2005.

  • This portfolio captured 107.55% of S&P 500 Index gains and 100.37% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • With beta of 1.00 and R2 of 0.98, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
1.51%
Beta
1.00
0.98
Upside Capture
107.55%
Downside Capture
100.37%

Expense Ratio

(Review) Growth Value has an expense ratio of 0.07%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

(Review) Growth Value ranks 39 for risk / return — below 39% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


(Review) Growth Value Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
(Review) Growth Value Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
(Review) Growth Value Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
(Review) Growth Value Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
(Review) Growth Value Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
(Review) Growth Value Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for (Review) Growth Value and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.94

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.63

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.59

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

11.84

-0.30


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
230.681.071.130.933.41
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
571.652.431.292.829.94
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
842.523.581.454.0315.20
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
401.431.951.251.404.90

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

(Review) Growth Value Sharpe ratios as of Jun 9, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.87
  • 5-Year: 0.69
  • 10-Year: 0.79
  • All Time: 0.54

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.59 to 2.46, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of (Review) Growth Value compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

(Review) Growth Value provided a 1.30% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.30%1.42%1.44%1.55%1.57%1.34%1.45%1.71%2.01%1.66%1.86%1.88%
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.37%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the (Review) Growth Value. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the (Review) Growth Value was 55.58%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 760 trading sessions.

The current (Review) Growth Value drawdown is 2.12%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-55.58%Mar 2009
1y 5mo3y 5d
4y 5moOct 2007 - Mar 2012
COVID crash2020
-35.29%Mar 2020
1mo 2d4mo 27d
5mo 29dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Bear market2022
-25.16%Sep 2022
8mo 28d1y 2mo
1y 11moJan 2022 - Dec 2023
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-20.28%Dec 2018
3mo 4d4mo 3d
7mo 7dSep 2018 - Apr 2019
2025 selloff2025
-18.55%Apr 2025
1mo 18d2mo 19d
4mo 7dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.33, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.15

1.12

1.10

1.08

1.06

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.06, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

(Review) Growth Value correlation to the S&P 500 Index

(Review) Growth Value has a 0.97 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.98


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VUG has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.95, while EFG has the lowest at 0.82.

EFG
0.82
VBR
0.86
VTV
0.91
VUG
0.95

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. (Review) Growth Value. VUG has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.94, while EFG has the lowest at 0.85.

EFG
0.85
VBR
0.91
VTV
0.92
VUG
0.94

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

EFGVBRVUGVTV
EFG1.000.720.780.76
VBR0.721.000.760.89
VUG0.780.761.000.77
VTV0.760.890.771.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Aug 5, 2005
Diversification Analysis

Find what (Review) Growth Value is missing

See which holdings overlap, where (Review) Growth Value is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification