Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Total Bond Market | 24% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | Gold, Precious Metals | 24% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | Large Cap Value Equities | 17% |
USD=X USD Cash | 24% | |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | REIT | 4% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Large Cap Blend Equities | 7% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Awesome, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Apr 10, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of BND
Returns By Period
As of Apr 3, 2026, the Awesome returned 2.38% Year-To-Date and 7.40% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Awesome | 0.00% | -3.20% | 2.38% | 6.14% | 16.53% | 12.72% | 8.08% | 7.40% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.22% | -0.98% | 0.31% | 0.85% | 4.27% | 3.53% | 0.30% | 1.70% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -1.92% | -8.27% | 8.35% | 21.03% | 49.02% | 32.51% | 21.53% | 13.97% |
USD=X USD Cash | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 0.21% | -2.18% | 2.41% | 6.33% | 19.66% | 17.04% | 11.41% | 12.76% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 0.16% | -3.26% | -3.13% | -1.24% | 17.86% | 18.10% | 10.66% | 13.75% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 1.36% | -4.43% | 3.06% | 1.04% | 2.95% | 7.33% | 3.14% | 4.85% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 11, 2007, Awesome's average daily return is +0.02%, while the average monthly return is +0.53%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 10.9 years.
Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +5.8%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -10.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, Awesome closed higher 38% of trading days. The best single day was May 7, 2010 with a return of +4.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -4.8%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.89% | 3.11% | -4.68% | 0.26% | 2.38% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2.76% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 0.73% | 0.96% | 1.56% | 0.08% | 2.47% | 3.80% | 1.24% | 2.02% | 0.49% | 19.93% |
| 2024 | -0.38% | 0.90% | 3.44% | -1.22% | 1.90% | 0.45% | 3.02% | 1.54% | 2.09% | 0.09% | 1.22% | -2.26% | 11.16% |
| 2023 | 4.02% | -2.94% | 2.58% | 0.65% | -1.24% | 1.26% | 1.52% | -1.18% | -2.97% | 0.62% | 4.14% | 2.90% | 9.41% |
| 2022 | -1.95% | 0.71% | 0.59% | -3.29% | -0.41% | -3.15% | 2.09% | -2.38% | -4.50% | 1.92% | 4.53% | -0.99% | -6.98% |
| 2021 | -0.50% | -0.83% | 1.31% | 2.42% | 2.43% | -1.46% | 1.24% | 0.59% | -2.12% | 2.02% | -0.78% | 2.45% | 6.84% |
Benchmark Metrics
Awesome has an annualized alpha of 3.70%, beta of 0.28, and R² of 0.53 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 11, 2007.
- This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (35.52%) than losses (27.69%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.70% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Beta of 0.28 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index — a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.
- Alpha
- 3.70%
- Beta
- 0.28
- R²
- 0.53
- Upside Capture
- 35.52%
- Downside Capture
- 27.69%
Expense Ratio
Awesome has an expense ratio of 0.17%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Awesome ranks 81 for risk / return — in the top 81% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 0.88 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 1.37 | +1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.39 | +1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 6.43 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 48 | 1.00 | 1.42 | 1.18 | 1.71 | 4.64 |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 80 | 1.77 | 2.19 | 1.32 | 2.57 | 9.28 |
USD=X USD Cash | — | — | — | — | — | — |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 65 | 1.23 | 1.75 | 1.27 | 1.69 | 7.94 |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 54 | 0.94 | 1.47 | 1.22 | 1.53 | 7.16 |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 16 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 1.05 | 0.29 | 1.11 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Awesome provided a 1.44% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 1.44% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.31% | 1.24% | 0.96% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.92% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD=X USD Cash | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.16% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.86% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Awesome. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Awesome was 20.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 294 trading sessions.
The current Awesome drawdown is 4.68%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -20.55% | Feb 29, 2008 | 266 | Nov 20, 2008 | 294 | Sep 10, 2009 | 560 |
| -13.09% | Feb 24, 2020 | 26 | Mar 20, 2020 | 77 | Jun 5, 2020 | 103 |
| -12.22% | Nov 15, 2021 | 334 | Oct 14, 2022 | 425 | Dec 13, 2023 | 759 |
| -6.93% | Mar 3, 2026 | 24 | Mar 26, 2026 | — | — | — |
| -6.93% | Jan 23, 2015 | 363 | Jan 20, 2016 | 90 | Apr 19, 2016 | 453 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.80, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | USD=X | BND | GLD | VNQ | PRF | VTI | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.00 | -0.14 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.67 |
| USD=X | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| BND | -0.14 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.22 | 0.04 | -0.17 | -0.13 | 0.17 |
| GLD | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.63 |
| VNQ | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.56 |
| PRF | 0.93 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.06 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.63 |
| VTI | 0.99 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.07 | 0.62 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| Portfolio | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.00 |