Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Large Cap Growth Equities | 70% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | Ultrashort Bond | 30% |
Find the right asset allocation for 2
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.50% | -0.17% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 22.93% | 19.37% | 11.84% | 13.61% |
Portfolio 2 | 0.09% | -1.86% | 2.87% | 3.20% | 14.89% | 17.54% | 11.60% | — |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.12% | -2.62% | 2.58% | 2.96% | 18.71% | 22.68% | 14.33% | 18.50% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 0.02% | 0.30% | 1.61% | 1.78% | 3.95% | 4.71% | 3.56% | — |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 28, 2020, 2's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.19%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.9 years.
Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Apr 2026 with a return of +9.3%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -9.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.
On a daily basis, 2 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +7.8%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -4.2%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.24% | -2.65% | -3.29% | 9.27% | 4.99% | -3.56% | 2.87% | ||||||
| 2025 | 1.56% | -2.79% | -5.51% | 1.17% | 6.02% | 4.45% | 2.54% | 0.81% | 3.38% | 3.34% | -1.15% | -0.21% | 13.86% |
| 2024 | 1.96% | 4.98% | 1.55% | -2.64% | 4.33% | 4.96% | -0.54% | 1.37% | 1.95% | -0.19% | 5.13% | 0.41% | 25.53% |
| 2023 | 7.05% | -0.79% | 5.93% | 1.07% | 4.62% | 4.95% | 2.61% | -0.53% | -3.61% | -0.93% | 7.89% | 3.28% | 35.59% |
| 2022 | -6.24% | -2.74% | 3.11% | -9.22% | -1.90% | -5.26% | 9.03% | -3.67% | -7.07% | 3.15% | 2.92% | -5.76% | -22.53% |
| 2021 | -0.50% | 0.28% | 1.04% | 5.37% | -1.17% | 4.53% | 2.33% | 2.74% | -3.85% | 6.21% | 0.22% | 1.02% | 19.32% |
Benchmark Metrics
2 has an annualized alpha of 0.70%, beta of 0.86, and R2 of 0.89 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 28, 2020.
- This portfolio participated in 82.65% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 81.79% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- With beta of 0.86 and R2 of 0.89, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 0.70%
- Beta
- 0.86
- R²
- 0.89
- Upside Capture
- 81.79%
- Downside Capture
- 82.65%
Expense Ratio
2 has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
2 ranks 19 for risk / return — in the bottom 19% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.86 | -0.53 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.53 | -0.69 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.53 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | 11.37 | -6.85 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 33 | 1.18 | 1.64 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 3.78 |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 100 | 20.28 | 275.69 | 195.55 | 398.20 | 4,461.98 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
2 provided a 1.42% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.81% | 1.79% | 0.82% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.71% | 0.73% | 0.85% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the 2 was 24.75%, occurring on Jan 5, 2023. Recovery took 220 trading sessions.
The current 2 drawdown is 3.94%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 bear market2023 | -24.75%Jan 2023 | 1y 1mo | 10mo 19d | 1y 12moNov 2021 - Nov 2023 |
2025 selloff2025 | -16.48%Apr 2025 | 3mo 22d | 2mo 19d | 6mo 11dDec 2024 - Jun 2025 |
2026 correction2026 | -11.15%Mar 2026 | 5mo 1d | 1mo 2d | 6mo 3dOct 2025 - May 2026 |
2024 pullback2024 | -8.63%Aug 2024 | 25d | 2mo 5d | 3moJul 2024 - Oct 2024 |
2020 pullback2020 | -8.12%Sep 2020 | 20d | 2mo 9d | 2mo 29dSep 2020 - Dec 2020 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.72, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.00, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.
2 correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | 0.93 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SCHG has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.93, while SGOV has the lowest at -0.02.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what 2 is missing
See which holdings overlap, where 2 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification