PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2 dividends
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ET 50.00%EPD 50.00%EquityEquity
PositionCategory/SectorTarget Weight
ET
Energy Transfer LP
Energy
50%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
Energy
50%

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 2 dividends

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2 dividends, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the 2 dividends returned 19.84% Year-To-Date and 12.65% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%-0.93%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
2 dividends
0.79%-5.70%19.84%19.45%18.13%22.65%18.41%12.65%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
-0.08%-5.05%19.79%19.53%24.08%20.73%15.96%10.61%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
1.65%-6.34%19.85%19.34%12.14%24.04%20.15%13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 3, 2006, 2 dividends's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.46%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.0 years.

Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +53.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -49.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 12 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 2 dividends closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +26.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 9, 2020 at -23.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20268.55%6.39%3.58%4.18%-4.17%0.35%19.84%
20255.16%-0.95%-0.63%-10.95%5.38%2.20%0.60%1.93%-2.93%-0.86%3.84%-1.71%-0.03%
20243.56%3.63%6.87%-1.01%1.55%2.60%0.84%1.30%-0.55%1.47%21.47%-5.04%40.68%
202310.01%-1.37%-0.04%3.39%-2.53%3.22%3.58%2.11%3.52%-3.57%4.23%-1.12%22.76%
202213.01%5.61%8.22%0.63%6.42%-12.75%12.50%2.10%-7.68%12.02%-0.66%-4.13%36.52%
20213.51%14.84%1.80%9.32%9.90%5.09%-5.92%-2.71%0.02%3.02%-7.80%0.33%33.30%

Benchmark Metrics

2 dividends has an annualized alpha of 9.69%, beta of 0.78, and R2 of 0.28 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 03, 2006.

  • This portfolio captured 114.14% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 91.30% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • R2 of 0.28 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
9.69%
Beta
0.78
0.28
Upside Capture
114.14%
Downside Capture
91.30%

Expense Ratio

2 dividends has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

2 dividends ranks 24 for risk / return — below 24% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


2 dividends Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
2 dividends Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2 dividends Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
2 dividends Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
2 dividends Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
2 dividends Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2 dividends and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.86

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.53

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.53

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

11.37

-4.74


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
83
1.542.241.283.249.50
ET
Energy Transfer LP
63
0.711.161.131.222.70

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

The current 2 dividends Sharpe ratio is 1.27 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 2 dividends compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

2 dividends provided a 6.44% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio6.44%7.36%6.57%8.23%7.56%7.80%13.18%7.87%8.10%6.48%5.89%6.66%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
5.88%6.74%6.63%7.51%7.79%8.20%9.09%6.23%6.97%6.29%5.88%5.90%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.00%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2 dividends. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 2 dividends was 66.95%, occurring on Feb 8, 2016. Recovery took 1557 trading sessions.

The current 2 dividends drawdown is 6.44%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2016 bear market2016
-66.95%Feb 2016
1y 2mo6y 2mo
7y 4moNov 2014 - Apr 2022
Financial crisis2007–2009
-54.95%Nov 2008
1y 4mo1y 23d
2y 5moJul 2007 - Dec 2009
2014 bear market2014
-20.91%Oct 2014
1mo 3d1mo 9d
2mo 12dSep 2014 - Nov 2014
Bear market2022
-19.79%Jul 2022
28d1mo 20d
2mo 18dJun 2022 - Aug 2022
2025 selloff2025
-18.88%Apr 2025
2mo 7d9mo 26d
12mo 3dJan 2025 - Jan 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.13

1.09

1.08

1.08

1.10

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.10, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

2 dividends correlation to the S&P 500 Index

2 dividends has a -0.02 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.45


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. EPD has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.42, while ET has the lowest at 0.41.

ET
0.41
EPD
0.42

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 2 dividends. ET has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.91, while EPD has the lowest at 0.83.

EPD
0.83
ET
0.91

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

EPDET
EPD1.000.57
ET0.571.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 3, 2006
Diversification Analysis

Find what 2 dividends is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 2 dividends is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification