PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZXM.TO achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FXM.TO's 18.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ZXM.TO has underperformed FXM.TO with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FXM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


ZXM.TO

1D
2.38%
1M
-3.18%
6M
6.21%
YTD
12.37%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
12.98%
ALL TIME*
12.56%

FXM.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.42%
6M
14.60%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
45.40%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
13.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$211.28KCA$184.82KCA$281.27K
CA$43.76KCA$31.09KCA$57.00K

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged
12.37%35.74%21.42%14.21%-20.62%25.67%16.23%30.39%-17.00%28.15%
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
18.11%38.54%30.05%5.79%-1.19%31.47%6.16%24.14%-16.22%11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZXM.TO and FXM.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.34

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO

Industrials

29.0%
3.2%

Financial Services

23.9%
14.7%

Technology

14.0%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.4%

Basic Materials

7.0%
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.9%

Energy

4.0%
14.8%

Utilities

2.9%
14.2%

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Communication Services

1.9%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
3.6%

Industrials

ZXM.TO
29.0%
FXM.TO
3.2%

Financial Services

ZXM.TO
23.9%
FXM.TO
14.7%

Technology

ZXM.TO
14.0%
FXM.TO
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZXM.TO
8.9%
FXM.TO
10.4%

Basic Materials

ZXM.TO
7.0%
FXM.TO
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZXM.TO
4.6%
FXM.TO
6.9%

Energy

ZXM.TO
4.0%
FXM.TO
14.8%

Utilities

ZXM.TO
2.9%
FXM.TO
14.2%

Healthcare

ZXM.TO
2.4%
FXM.TO

-

Communication Services

ZXM.TO
1.9%
FXM.TO
9.2%

Real Estate

ZXM.TO
1.5%
FXM.TO
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZXM.TO
ZXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FXM.TO
FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZXM.TOFXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.75

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

5.51

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

21.50

-12.36

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZXM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZXM.TO and FXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.22%, smaller than the maximum FXM.TO drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXM.TO and FXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZXM.TOFXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.22%

-46.41%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-8.11%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

-12.44%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-16.08%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.22%

-46.41%

+11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-0.65%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-4.64%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.08%

+0.97%

Volatility

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) at 2.53%. This indicates that ZXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZXM.TOFXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

2.53%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

8.27%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

11.25%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

14.15%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

16.88%

-0.27%

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZXM.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FXM.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than FXM.TO's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
1.72%1.91%2.17%2.96%2.18%2.19%2.40%2.04%2.52%1.70%1.83%2.24%
ZXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged
1.94%2.39%2.97%3.57%5.50%1.58%0.86%1.19%1.48%0.88%1.19%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZXM.TO and FXM.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FXM.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZXM.TO.

ZXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while FXM.TO is Canada Equities. ZXM.TO tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index, while FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZXM.TO and 0.64% for FXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZXM.TO and FXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer