ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO
ZXM.TO (CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged) and FXM.TO (CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZXM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index, while FXM.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZXM.TO returned 12.98%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for FXM.TO. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZXM.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXM.TO.
Performance
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZXM.TO achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FXM.TO's 18.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ZXM.TO has underperformed FXM.TO with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FXM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.
ZXM.TO
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.56%
FXM.TO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$211.28K | CA$184.82K | CA$281.27K | |
| CA$43.76K | CA$31.09K | CA$57.00K |
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged | 12.37% | 35.74% | 21.42% | 14.21% | -20.62% | 25.67% | 16.23% | 30.39% | -17.00% | 28.15% |
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 18.11% | 38.54% | 30.05% | 5.79% | -1.19% | 31.47% | 6.16% | 24.14% | -16.22% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZXM.TO and FXM.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.34 |
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Financial Services
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Technology
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Basic Materials
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Energy
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Utilities
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Healthcare
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
-
Communication Services
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Real Estate
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZXM.TO
FXM.TO
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZXM.TO | FXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.75 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 5.51 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 21.50 | -12.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.22%, smaller than the maximum FXM.TO drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXM.TO and FXM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZXM.TO | FXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.22% | -46.41% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -8.11% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.74% | -12.44% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | -16.08% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -46.41% | +11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -0.65% | -5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -4.64% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.08% | +0.97% |
Volatility
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) at 2.53%. This indicates that ZXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZXM.TO | FXM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 2.53% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.05% | 8.27% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 11.25% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 14.15% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.88% | -0.27% |
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZXM.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FXM.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZXM.TO vs. FXM.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than FXM.TO's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXM.TO CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF | 1.72% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.96% | 2.18% | 2.19% | 2.40% | 2.04% | 2.52% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 2.24% |
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged | 1.94% | 2.39% | 2.97% | 3.57% | 5.50% | 1.58% | 0.86% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 0.88% | 1.19% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZXM.TO and FXM.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FXM.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZXM.TO.
ZXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while FXM.TO is Canada Equities. ZXM.TO tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index, while FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZXM.TO and 0.64% for FXM.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZXM.TO and FXM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer