ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO).
ZXM.TO and CMNY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZXM.TO is a passively managed fund by CI that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2014. CMNY.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Jul 25, 2023.
Performance
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged | 3.69% | 35.75% | 21.41% | 3.64% |
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 0.57% | 2.83% | 4.77% | 2.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZXM.TO achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than CMNY.TO's 0.57% return.
ZXM.TO
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
CMNY.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZXM.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNY.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZXM.TO
CMNY.TO
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZXM.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 6.86 | -4.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 15.54 | -13.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 3.35 | -1.86 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 43.70 | -40.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 176.75 | -164.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZXM.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 6.86 | -4.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 3.72 | -3.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZXM.TO and CMNY.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than CMNY.TO's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZXM.TO CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged | 2.44% | 2.39% | 2.97% | 3.57% | 5.50% | 1.58% | 0.86% | 1.19% | 1.49% | 0.89% | 1.19% | 1.11% |
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series | 2.64% | 2.89% | 4.64% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.22%, which is greater than CMNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXM.TO and CMNY.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZXM.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.22% | -0.83% | -34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -0.06% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -0.02% | -8.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -0.05% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 0.01% | +2.77% |
Volatility
ZXM.TO vs. CMNY.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) at 0.09%. This indicates that ZXM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZXM.TO | CMNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 0.09% | +6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 0.25% | +9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 0.38% | +16.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 1.05% | +14.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 1.05% | +15.51% |