ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO
ZXLK.TO (BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF) and YPLT.NEO (Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZXLK.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Technology Select Sector Index, while YPLT.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose. ZXLK.TO is passively managed, while YPLT.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, ZXLK.TO returned 60.51% vs 20.85% for YPLT.NEO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZXLK.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YPLT.NEO.
Performance
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZXLK.TO achieves a 37.64% return, which is significantly higher than YPLT.NEO's -12.66% return.
ZXLK.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 28.47%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YPLT.NEO
- 1D
- -6.20%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.66%
- 6M
- -12.30%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 37.64% | 16.58% |
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -12.66% | 62.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ZXLK.TO
YPLT.NEO
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) and Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZXLK.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.12 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 0.50 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 1.12 | +6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZXLK.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 0.35 | +2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.46 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZXLK.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, smaller than the maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZXLK.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.20% | -41.92% | +19.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -41.92% | +20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -26.29% | +26.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -15.38% | +9.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 18.75% | -10.97% |
Volatility
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) is 7.11%, while Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that ZXLK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YPLT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZXLK.TO | YPLT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 15.23% | -8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 45.60% | -28.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 60.50% | -39.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 69.38% | -40.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 69.38% | -40.42% |
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZXLK.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than YPLT.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ZXLK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than YPLT.NEO's 47.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
YPLT.NEO Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 47.71% | 14.71% |
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZXLK.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZXLK.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.
ZXLK.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while YPLT.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ZXLK.TO and 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer