PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) and Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZXLK.TO achieves a 37.64% return, which is significantly higher than YPLT.NEO's -12.66% return.


ZXLK.TO

1D
-0.16%
1M
24.03%
YTD
37.64%
6M
28.47%
1Y
60.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YPLT.NEO

1D
-6.20%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-12.66%
6M
-12.30%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZXLK.TO
ZXLK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZXLK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZXLK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZXLK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZXLK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZXLK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

YPLT.NEO
YPLT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YPLT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YPLT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YPLT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
YPLT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
YPLT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) and Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZXLK.TOYPLT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.12

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

0.50

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

1.12

+6.69

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZXLK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the YPLT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZXLK.TOYPLT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

0.35

+2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.46

+1.12

Drawdowns

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZXLK.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, smaller than the maximum YPLT.NEO drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZXLK.TOYPLT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.20%

-41.92%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-41.92%

+20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-26.29%

+26.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-15.38%

+9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

18.75%

-10.97%

Volatility

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) is 7.11%, while Palantir (PLTR) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YPLT.NEO) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that ZXLK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YPLT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZXLK.TOYPLT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

15.23%

-8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

45.60%

-28.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

60.50%

-39.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.96%

69.38%

-40.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.96%

69.38%

-40.42%

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZXLK.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than YPLT.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZXLK.TO vs. YPLT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ZXLK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than YPLT.NEO's 47.71% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZXLK.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZXLK.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.

ZXLK.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while YPLT.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ZXLK.TO and 0.40% for YPLT.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZXLK.TO and YPLT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer