ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO
ZWU.TO (BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. ZWU.TO is actively managed, while UMVP.TO is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZWU.TO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
UMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 8.87% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWU.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWU.TO
UMVP.TO
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWU.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWU.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 5.03 | -4.61 |
Drawdowns
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWU.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWU.TO and UMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWU.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -4.57% | -32.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -0.96% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -0.81% | -4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | — | — |
Volatility
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWU.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.59% | 9.11% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 9.11% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 9.11% | +5.07% |
Dividends
ZWU.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than UMVP.TO's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 7.09% | 7.59% | 7.96% | 8.54% | 8.35% | 7.43% | 7.94% | 6.29% | 6.84% | 6.46% | 6.77% | 7.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWU.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for ZWU.TO and UMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer