ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO).
ZWU.TO and QMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZWU.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. QMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Oct 25, 2023.
Performance
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 11.68% | 13.18% | 10.97% | 8.43% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | -15.25% | 16.57% | 37.65% | 16.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWU.TO achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's -15.25% return.
ZWU.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -15.25%
- 6M
- -14.61%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZWU.TO and QMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWU.TO
QMAX.TO
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWU.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 0.46 | +1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 0.83 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.54 | +2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 1.52 | +8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWU.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 0.46 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWU.TO and QMAX.TO is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than QMAX.TO's 11.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 6.92% | 7.59% | 7.96% | 8.54% | 8.35% | 7.43% | 7.94% | 6.29% | 6.84% | 6.46% | 6.77% | 7.57% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.87% | 10.79% | 10.90% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWU.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than QMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWU.TO and QMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWU.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -26.77% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.71% | -22.86% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -20.12% | +19.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -5.29% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 8.16% | -6.36% |
Volatility
ZWU.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) is 2.41%, while Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that ZWU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZWU.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 7.64% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.28% | 16.03% | -10.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 26.26% | -17.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 23.56% | -13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 23.56% | -9.41% |