PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWU.TO vs. IDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZWU.TO is traded in CAD, while IDVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDVO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWU.TO achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than IDVO's 14.87% return.


ZWU.TO

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.74%
YTD
11.54%
1Y
15.14%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.74%
ALL TIME*
5.49%

IDVO

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.56%
6M
5.00%
YTD
14.87%
1Y
32.85%
3Y*
23.45%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF
11.54%13.18%10.97%-2.79%-6.41%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
14.87%30.23%19.49%14.73%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWU.TO and IDVO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between ZWU.TO and IDVO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWU.TO
IDVO

Utilities

50.6%
3.1%

Energy

24.1%
12.7%

Communication Services

19.3%
10.7%

Financial Services

5.2%
22.3%

Basic Materials

-

13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.5%

Healthcare

-

7.5%

Industrials

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

11.9%

Utilities

ZWU.TO
50.6%
IDVO
3.1%

Energy

ZWU.TO
24.1%
IDVO
12.7%

Communication Services

ZWU.TO
19.3%
IDVO
10.7%

Financial Services

ZWU.TO
5.2%
IDVO
22.3%

Basic Materials

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
9.5%

Healthcare

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
7.5%

Industrials

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
6.9%

Real Estate

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO

-

Technology

ZWU.TO

-

IDVO
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWU.TO
ZWU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ZWU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZWU.TOIDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.25

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

12.56

-4.23

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWU.TO and IDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWU.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWU.TO and IDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWU.TOIDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-15.97%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-10.14%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-15.97%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.51%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-1.86%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.62%

-0.80%

Volatility

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) is 3.38%, while Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that ZWU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWU.TOIDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.77%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

14.23%

-7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

16.79%

-8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

17.32%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.20%

17.32%

-3.12%

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZWU.TO and IDVO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

ZWU.TO vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

ZWU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than IDVO's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.69%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF
7.05%7.59%7.96%8.54%8.35%7.43%7.94%6.29%6.84%6.46%6.77%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWU.TO and IDVO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZWU.TO and IDVO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

ZWU.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Amplify.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWU.TO and IDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer