ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO
ZWU.TO (BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWU.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZWU.TO returned 6.08%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWU.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.
Performance
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWU.TO achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWU.TO has underperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 6.08%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.
ZWU.TO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 29.01%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- 1Y
- 41.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 25.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 10.15% | 13.18% | 10.97% | -2.79% | -3.89% | 15.80% | -7.09% | 23.48% | -5.73% | 5.63% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 29.01% | 13.13% | 17.39% | 5.72% | 41.33% | 80.55% | -27.98% | 6.54% | -31.00% | -18.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWU.TO and ENCC.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011 | 0.38 |
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWU.TO
ENCC.TO
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
ZWU.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Energy
ZWU.TO
ENCC.TO
Communication Services
ZWU.TO
ENCC.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Financial Services
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Healthcare
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Industrials
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Real Estate
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Technology
ZWU.TO
-
ENCC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWU.TO
ENCC.TO
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWU.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.53 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.93 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 17.54 | -8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWU.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.98 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.11 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.29 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.00 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWU.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWU.TO and ENCC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWU.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -89.91% | +52.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -8.48% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -16.67% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -25.57% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | -82.16% | +44.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.99% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -39.82% | +34.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.38% | -0.65% |
Volatility
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) is 2.81%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that ZWU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWU.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 5.66% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 12.36% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.59% | 14.08% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 23.03% | -12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 29.05% | -14.87% |
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWU.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWU.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.09% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.09% | 8.35% | 6.92% | 4.77% | 15.15% |
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 7.09% | 7.59% | 7.96% | 8.54% | 8.35% | 7.43% | 7.94% | 6.29% | 6.84% | 6.46% | 6.77% | 7.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWU.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZWU.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWU.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
ZWU.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWU.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWU.TO and ENCC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer