ZWT.TO vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).
ZWT.TO and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZWT.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jan 19, 2021. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWT.TO BMO Covered Call Technology ETF | -6.29% | 18.15% | 49.78% | 65.75% | -31.60% | 22.78% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.99% | 18.89% | 32.08% | 52.58% | -22.58% | 30.19% |
Different Trading Currencies
ZWT.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWT.TO achieves a -6.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's -4.99% return.
ZWT.TO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- -6.29%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -4.99%
- 6M
- -5.21%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWT.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZWT.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ZWT.TO
XLK
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWT.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.67 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 4.68 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWT.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.78 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.03 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWT.TO and XLK is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ZWT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWT.TO BMO Covered Call Technology ETF | 5.09% | 4.46% | 3.34% | 3.83% | 6.54% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -29.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWT.TO and XLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWT.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -82.05% | +46.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -15.92% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -33.56% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -11.04% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -35.17% | +26.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 4.98% | +0.39% |
Volatility
ZWT.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 7.88% and 8.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZWT.TO | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 8.00% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 16.30% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.72% | 26.73% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 23.13% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 22.88% | +0.28% |