PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWT.TO achieves a -6.29% return, which is significantly lower than MTRX.TO's 15.92% return.


ZWT.TO

1D
1.31%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-6.29%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
17.79%
10Y*

MTRX.TO

1D
3.22%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
15.92%
6M
18.12%
1Y
82.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWT.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MTRX.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWT.TO
ZWT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MTRX.TO
MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWT.TOMTRX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

2.71

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

3.62

-2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.58

-4.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.59

19.05

-14.46

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWT.TO and MTRX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWT.TOMTRX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.71

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.65

-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between ZWT.TO and MTRX.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than MTRX.TO's 0.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
ZWT.TO
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF
5.09%4.46%3.34%3.83%6.54%4.00%
MTRX.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than MTRX.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWT.TO and MTRX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWT.TOMTRX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-19.75%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.93%

-14.79%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.96%

-7.03%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-4.36%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

4.33%

+1.04%

Volatility

ZWT.TO vs. MTRX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) is 7.88%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that ZWT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTRX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZWT.TOMTRX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

13.19%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

22.53%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.72%

30.63%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.25%

31.67%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

31.67%

-8.51%