ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO
ZWP.TO (BMO Covered Call Europe High Dividend ETF) and EHE.TO (CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF) are both Europe Equities funds. ZWP.TO is actively managed, while EHE.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWP.TO returned 11.26%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for EHE.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWP.TO achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than EHE.TO's 7.41% return.
ZWP.TO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- —
EHE.TO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWP.TO BMO Covered Call Europe High Dividend ETF | 6.44% | 22.37% | 8.60% | 16.33% | -0.97% | 12.69% | -3.55% | 13.15% | -8.57% |
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF | 7.41% | 22.91% | 4.19% | 22.26% | -10.45% | 23.79% | -5.96% | 24.49% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWP.TO and EHE.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ZWP.TO and EHE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Industrials
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Healthcare
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Utilities
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
-
Energy
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Communication Services
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Basic Materials
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Technology
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
Real Estate
ZWP.TO
-
EHE.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWP.TO
EHE.TO
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Europe High Dividend ETF (ZWP.TO) and CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZWP.TO | EHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.68 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 6.34 | -0.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWP.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum EHE.TO drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWP.TO and EHE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWP.TO | EHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -38.20% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -11.85% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.04% | -16.30% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -22.91% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.97% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -5.32% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.13% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Europe High Dividend ETF (ZWP.TO) is 4.08%, while CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that ZWP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWP.TO | EHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 5.06% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 13.37% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 16.28% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 18.09% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 17.45% | -1.75% |
Dividends
ZWP.TO vs. EHE.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than EHE.TO's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF | 2.16% | 2.16% | 4.38% | 3.30% | 2.19% | 1.90% | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.08% | 1.37% | 0.13% |
ZWP.TO BMO Covered Call Europe High Dividend ETF | 6.08% | 6.22% | 7.13% | 7.23% | 7.04% | 6.45% | 7.28% | 6.92% | 6.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWP.TO and EHE.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI.
Find the right allocation for ZWP.TO and EHE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer