PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
-2.90%16.61%40.99%14.61%
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
1.67%43.71%24.77%8.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWK.TO achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 1.67% return.


ZWK.TO

1D
3.43%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
2.19%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*

HBNK.TO

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
1.67%
6M
14.60%
1Y
52.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWK.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HBNK.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWK.TO
ZWK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HBNK.TO
HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWK.TOHBNK.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

3.89

-3.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

4.95

-3.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.76

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

6.21

-4.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.61

24.46

-20.85

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWK.TO and HBNK.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWK.TOHBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

3.89

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

2.31

-2.12

Correlation

The correlation between ZWK.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than HBNK.TO's 2.97% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
6.79%6.49%7.05%10.38%8.21%6.54%8.46%5.11%
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.97%3.24%4.15%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWK.TO and HBNK.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWK.TOHBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-14.78%

-33.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.24%

-8.48%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.07%

-6.03%

-4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.73%

-2.41%

-14.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

2.15%

+3.58%

Volatility

ZWK.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) at 5.70%. This indicates that ZWK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZWK.TOHBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

5.70%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

9.90%

+5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.71%

13.46%

+12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

12.43%

+11.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.77%

12.43%

+16.34%