PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZWH.TO (BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and XDU.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWH.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while XDU.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. ZWH.TO is actively managed, while XDU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWH.TO returned 11.42%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for XDU.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZWH.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XDU.TO.

Performance

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWH.TO achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than XDU.TO's 11.82% return.

ZWH.TO

1D
0.66%
1M
7.97%
YTD
13.86%
6M
11.86%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
9.87%

XDU.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
5.28%
YTD
11.82%
6M
6.05%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWH.TO
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF		13.86%6.40%19.30%5.04%-0.57%24.20%0.19%17.18%0.10%2.22%
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		11.82%2.42%14.09%3.53%1.36%20.68%-1.03%15.73%4.46%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWH.TO and XDU.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.81

The correlation between ZWH.TO and XDU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZWH.TO
XDU.TO

Technology

28.4%
13.8%

Healthcare

12.6%
20.7%

Financial Services

12.0%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
14.6%

Energy

9.0%
12.3%

Utilities

6.5%
3.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.4%

Industrials

4.7%
12.4%

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

ZWH.TO
28.4%
XDU.TO
13.8%

Healthcare

ZWH.TO
12.6%
XDU.TO
20.7%

Financial Services

ZWH.TO
12.0%
XDU.TO
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZWH.TO
9.4%
XDU.TO
14.6%

Energy

ZWH.TO
9.0%
XDU.TO
12.3%

Utilities

ZWH.TO
6.5%
XDU.TO
3.8%

Communication Services

ZWH.TO
6.3%
XDU.TO
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWH.TO
5.2%
XDU.TO
9.4%

Industrials

ZWH.TO
4.7%
XDU.TO
12.4%

Real Estate

ZWH.TO
4.2%
XDU.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZWH.TO
1.7%
XDU.TO
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with ZWH.TO:
ZWH.TO vs. ZWC.TOZWH.TO vs. JEPIZWH.TO vs. XEI.TOZWH.TO vs. XDIV.TOZWH.TO vs. HMAX.TOZWH.TO vs. SCHDZWH.TO vs. PDF.TO
Often compared with XDU.TO:
XDU.TO vs. XDG.TOXDU.TO vs. SCHDXDU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDU.TO vs. XHD.TOXDU.TO vs. XUS.TOXDU.TO vs. XIU.TOXDU.TO vs. VFV.TO

Return for Risk

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZWH.TO
ZWH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZWH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
XDU.TO
XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZWH.TOXDU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.77
1.58

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.08
2.20

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.28

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

2.78

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

8.23

+10.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWH.TO and XDU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZWH.TOXDU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

1.58

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.75

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.56

+0.23

Drawdowns

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than XDU.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWH.TO and XDU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZWH.TOXDU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-26.12%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-6.13%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-16.69%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.59%

-16.69%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.87%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

2.07%

-0.63%

Volatility

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) at 2.73%. This indicates that ZWH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZWH.TOXDU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.73%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

8.39%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

10.83%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

12.08%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.91%

-0.07%

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWH.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDU.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZWH.TO vs. XDU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than XDU.TO's 2.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		2.25%2.46%2.12%2.31%2.05%2.06%2.72%2.31%2.27%1.27%0.00%0.00%
ZWH.TO
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF		5.76%6.22%4.87%5.71%6.03%5.64%6.59%5.97%5.66%5.46%5.57%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZWH.TO and XDU.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDU.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDU.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWH.TO.

ZWH.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while XDU.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWH.TO and 0.16% for XDU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWH.TO and XDU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer