ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO
ZWH.TO (BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and ENCL.TO (Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWH.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while ENCL.TO is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZWH.TO returned 27.24% vs 52.50% for ENCL.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWH.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for ENCL.TO.
Performance
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWH.TO achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 36.58% return.
ZWH.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
ENCL.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 36.58%
- 6M
- 32.07%
- 1Y
- 52.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 13.86% | 6.40% | 19.30% | 3.90% |
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD | 36.58% | 14.97% | 20.32% | -3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWH.TO and ENCL.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ZWH.TO and ENCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Healthcare
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Financial Services
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Energy
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
Utilities
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Communication Services
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Industrials
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Real Estate
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWH.TO
ENCL.TO
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWH.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 4.91 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 17.58 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWH.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.98 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than ENCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWH.TO and ENCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWH.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -21.05% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.69% | -10.75% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.54% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -3.95% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 3.00% | -1.56% |
Volatility
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) is 3.46%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that ZWH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWH.TO | ENCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 7.30% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 15.75% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 17.75% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 20.15% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 20.15% | -5.31% |
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWH.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCL.TO's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWH.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCL.TO Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD | 13.35% | 17.14% | 18.56% | 4.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.76% | 6.22% | 4.87% | 5.71% | 6.03% | 5.64% | 6.59% | 5.97% | 5.66% | 5.46% | 5.57% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWH.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZWH.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWH.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.86% for ENCL.TO.
ZWH.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ENCL.TO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWH.TO and 1.86% for ENCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWH.TO and ENCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer