ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO
ZWH.TO (BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZWH.TO returned 27.24% vs 107.90% for AVGY.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWH.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AVGY.TO.
Performance
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWH.TO achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 42.92% return.
ZWH.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 13.86% | 3.79% |
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 42.92% | 83.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWH.TO and AVGY.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWH.TO
AVGY.TO
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWH.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 3.81 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 8.81 | +10.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWH.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.39 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.30 | -1.50 |
Drawdowns
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than AVGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWH.TO and AVGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWH.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -28.78% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.69% | -28.50% | +22.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -8.43% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 12.29% | -10.85% |
Volatility
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) is 3.46%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that ZWH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWH.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 13.20% | -9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 33.23% | -25.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 45.46% | -35.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 51.13% | -39.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 51.13% | -36.29% |
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWH.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWH.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than AVGY.TO's 19.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 19.08% | 14.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.76% | 6.22% | 4.87% | 5.71% | 6.03% | 5.64% | 6.59% | 5.97% | 5.66% | 5.46% | 5.57% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWH.TO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWH.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWH.TO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWH.TO and AVGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer