PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZWG.TO
BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF
2.31%7.31%21.47%5.40%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
5.96%9.95%5.97%0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWG.TO achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than UMAX.TO's 5.96% return.


ZWG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.76%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

UMAX.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
5.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZWG.TO and UMAX.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWG.TO
ZWG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWG.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.63

-1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

2.26

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.98

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.55

9.14

-6.60

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWG.TO and UMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWG.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.63

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.95

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ZWG.TO and UMAX.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than UMAX.TO's 14.26% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ZWG.TO
BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF
6.32%6.41%6.48%7.42%7.23%6.40%6.09%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.26%14.86%14.81%6.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWG.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, which is greater than UMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWG.TO and UMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWG.TOUMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-10.09%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-6.23%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-1.83%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-2.05%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.35%

+1.98%

Volatility

ZWG.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) at 2.12%. This indicates that ZWG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZWG.TOUMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

2.12%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

4.70%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

7.74%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

8.66%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.05%

8.66%

+40.39%