ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO
ZWG.TO (BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZWG.TO returned 22.65% vs 107.90% for AVGY.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWG.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AVGY.TO.
Performance
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWG.TO achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 42.92% return.
ZWG.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 4.04% |
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 42.92% | 83.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWG.TO and AVGY.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWG.TO
AVGY.TO
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWG.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.81 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 8.81 | +3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWG.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.39 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 2.30 | -2.09 |
Drawdowns
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWG.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum AVGY.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWG.TO and AVGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWG.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -28.78% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.88% | -28.50% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.45% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -8.43% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 12.29% | -10.50% |
Volatility
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) is 4.16%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that ZWG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWG.TO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 13.20% | -9.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 33.23% | -24.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 45.46% | -34.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 51.13% | -39.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 239.97% | 51.13% | +188.84% |
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWG.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWG.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than AVGY.TO's 19.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 19.08% | 14.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.88% | 6.41% | 6.48% | 7.42% | 7.23% | 6.40% | 6.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWG.TO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWG.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWG.TO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWG.TO and AVGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer