ZWEN.TO vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
ZWEN.TO and SPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZWEN.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Performance
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF | 31.77% | 6.74% | 10.43% | 2.68% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -3.08% | 12.32% | 35.62% | 18.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
ZWEN.TO is traded in CAD, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWEN.TO achieves a 31.77% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -5.73% return.
ZWEN.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 31.77%
- 6M
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 29.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- 10.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWEN.TO has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ZWEN.TO
SPY
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWEN.TO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.57 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.91 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.99 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 3.69 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWEN.TO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.57 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWEN.TO and SPY is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ZWEN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF | 7.38% | 9.53% | 9.09% | 8.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.14% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWEN.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWEN.TO and SPY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWEN.TO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -55.19% | +36.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.75% | -12.05% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -6.24% | +5.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -9.09% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 2.52% | +4.02% |
Volatility
ZWEN.TO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZWEN.TO | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.26% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 9.16% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 18.66% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 15.11% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 16.18% | +1.58% |