ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO
ZWEN.TO (BMO Covered Call Energy ETF) and AMAX.TO (Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWEN.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while AMAX.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZWEN.TO returned 32.52% vs 36.14% for AMAX.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWEN.TO charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AMAX.TO.
Performance
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWEN.TO achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than AMAX.TO's -7.81% return.
ZWEN.TO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 25.05%
- 6M
- 26.23%
- 1Y
- 32.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMAX.TO
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- 36.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF | 25.05% | 6.74% | 9.16% |
AMAX.TO Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | -7.81% | 113.24% | 27.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWEN.TO and AMAX.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWEN.TO
AMAX.TO
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) and Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZWEN.TO | AMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 1.11 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 2.91 | +7.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWEN.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum AMAX.TO drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWEN.TO and AMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWEN.TO | AMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -32.73% | +13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -32.73% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.07% | -28.21% | +22.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -6.25% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 12.47% | -9.31% |
Volatility
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Energy ETF (ZWEN.TO) is 5.82%, while Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (AMAX.TO) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that ZWEN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWEN.TO | AMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 15.32% | -9.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 35.37% | -21.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 42.20% | -25.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 34.74% | -16.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 34.74% | -16.48% |
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWEN.TO has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWEN.TO vs. AMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWEN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, less than AMAX.TO's 9.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX.TO Hamilton Gold Producer YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.66% | 6.96% | 9.67% | 0.00% |
ZWEN.TO BMO Covered Call Energy ETF | 7.88% | 9.53% | 9.09% | 8.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWEN.TO and AMAX.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for ZWEN.TO.
ZWEN.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while AMAX.TO is Gold. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for ZWEN.TO and 0.65% for AMAX.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWEN.TO and AMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer