ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO
ZWC.TO (BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while ZCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. ZWC.TO is actively managed, while ZCN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWC.TO returned 11.09%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for ZCN.TO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZWC.TO charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ZCN.TO.
Performance
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZWC.TO having a 11.12% return and ZCN.TO slightly lower at 10.70%.
ZWC.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- —
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 11.12% | 22.79% | 12.00% | 7.54% | -3.54% | 25.39% | -6.92% | 17.32% | -10.05% | 7.34% |
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 10.70% | 31.51% | 21.64% | 11.63% | -5.84% | 25.05% | 5.69% | 22.85% | -8.84% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWC.TO and ZCN.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ZWC.TO and ZCN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Energy
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Basic Materials
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Utilities
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Communication Services
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Industrials
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
Healthcare
ZWC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Real Estate
ZWC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Technology
ZWC.TO
-
ZCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWC.TO
ZCN.TO
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.50 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 3.75 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.23 | 17.48 | +5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 2.76 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWC.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.57%, which is greater than ZCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWC.TO and ZCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.57% | -37.18% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -9.30% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.09% | -12.25% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.43% | -16.25% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.14% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -4.76% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 1.99% | -0.78% |
Volatility
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) is 2.40%, while BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that ZWC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWC.TO | ZCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 3.49% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 10.31% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 12.66% | -4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 13.09% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 14.99% | -0.05% |
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWC.TO has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCN.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWC.TO vs. ZCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than ZCN.TO's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.84% | 3.33% |
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.64% | 5.92% | 6.73% | 7.62% | 7.01% | 6.60% | 8.15% | 6.92% | 7.11% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWC.TO and ZCN.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for ZWC.TO.
ZWC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZCN.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for ZWC.TO and 0.06% for ZCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWC.TO and ZCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer