ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZWC.TO (BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while EMAX.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZWC.TO returned 29.76% vs 51.45% for EMAX.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWC.TO charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMAX.TO.

Performance

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWC.TO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 30.95% return.

ZWC.TO

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 13.20%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 17.80%
• 5Y*: 11.31%
• 10Y*: —

EMAX.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 30.95%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 51.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF	12.26%	22.79%	13.27%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	30.95%	4.63%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.34

The correlation between ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZWC.TO	EMAX.TO
Financial Services	38.7%	-
Energy	22.9%	100.0%
Basic Materials	12.7%	-
Utilities	8.9%	-
Communication Services	6.4%	-
Industrials	4.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWC.TO

ZWC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZWC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZWC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZWC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ZWC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZWC.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	2.60	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.39	3.33	+2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.42	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.99	4.17	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.65	13.39	+11.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZWC.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81	2.60	+1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.73	-0.17

Drawdowns

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWC.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.57%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZWC.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.57%	-27.55%	-13.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-12.39%	+6.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.58%	+3.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-9.30%	+4.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	3.85%	-2.64%

Volatility

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) is 2.51%, while Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that ZWC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZWC.TO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	7.47%	-4.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.83%	15.23%	-8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	19.97%	-12.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.14%	22.39%	-12.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	22.39%	-7.45%

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWC.TO has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZWC.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than EMAX.TO's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.23%	13.44%	12.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF	5.58%	5.92%	6.73%	7.62%	7.01%	6.60%	8.15%	6.92%	7.11%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO in my portfolio?

ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZWC.TO or EMAX.TO?

On fees, EMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZWC.TO or EMAX.TO?

EMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for ZWC.TO.

What is the main difference between ZWC.TO and EMAX.TO?

ZWC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EMAX.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for ZWC.TO and 0.65% for EMAX.TO.