ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO
ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) and HCAL.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while HCAL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index (125%). ZWB.TO is actively managed, while HCAL.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWB.TO returned 13.82%/yr vs 20.76%/yr for HCAL.TO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ZWB.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HCAL.TO.
Performance
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWB.TO achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than HCAL.TO's 23.54% return.
ZWB.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 49.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
HCAL.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 23.54%
- 6M
- 30.66%
- 1Y
- 76.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.62%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 16.23% | 34.91% | 19.41% | 6.67% | -11.00% | 30.81% | 11.75% |
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 23.54% | 54.09% | 29.04% | 11.73% | -17.53% | 51.61% | 16.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWB.TO and HCAL.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ZWB.TO and HCAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWB.TO
HCAL.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ZWB.TO
HCAL.TO
Basic Materials
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Communication Services
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Energy
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Healthcare
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Industrials
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Real Estate
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Technology
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Utilities
ZWB.TO
-
HCAL.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWB.TO
HCAL.TO
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWB.TO | HCAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 1.88 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | 7.26 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.83 | 31.55 | -2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWB.TO | HCAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44 | 4.89 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.64 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than HCAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and HCAL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWB.TO | HCAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.36% | -35.05% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -10.65% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -18.77% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -35.05% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -2.42% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -9.62% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.45% | -0.71% |
Volatility
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) is 4.26%, while Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that ZWB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWB.TO | HCAL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 6.05% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 14.08% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 15.82% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 17.16% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 17.00% | -1.32% |
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWB.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than HCAL.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWB.TO vs. HCAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than HCAL.TO's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 3.49% | 4.20% | 6.12% | 7.37% | 7.47% | 4.99% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 5.02% | 5.38% | 6.66% | 7.62% | 7.30% | 5.46% | 5.80% | 5.53% | 5.59% | 4.80% | 5.04% | 5.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ZWB.TO and HCAL.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HCAL.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for ZWB.TO.
ZWB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HCAL.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for ZWB.TO and 0.65% for HCAL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWB.TO and HCAL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer