ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO
ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) and CIC.TO (CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZWB.TO returned 12.24%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for CIC.TO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZWB.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for CIC.TO.
Performance
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZWB.TO having a 16.23% return and CIC.TO slightly lower at 16.07%. Over the past 10 years, ZWB.TO has underperformed CIC.TO with an annualized return of 12.24%, while CIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.90% annualized return.
ZWB.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 49.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
CIC.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 49.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 16.23% | 34.91% | 19.41% | 6.67% | -11.00% | 30.81% | 1.68% | 14.32% | -8.08% | 11.52% |
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 16.07% | 36.24% | 21.30% | 6.58% | -10.99% | 33.76% | 1.89% | 14.12% | -8.88% | 12.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWB.TO and CIC.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2011 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ZWB.TO and CIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWB.TO
CIC.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ZWB.TO
CIC.TO
Basic Materials
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Communication Services
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Energy
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Healthcare
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Industrials
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Real Estate
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Technology
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Utilities
ZWB.TO
-
CIC.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWB.TO
CIC.TO
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWB.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 1.87 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | 6.09 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.83 | 28.56 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWB.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44 | 4.45 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.80 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CIC.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and CIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWB.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.36% | -38.55% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -8.23% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -14.32% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -26.34% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -38.55% | -0.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.58% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -5.49% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.75% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) at 4.00%. This indicates that ZWB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWB.TO | CIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.00% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 9.95% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 11.26% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 12.75% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 16.29% | -0.61% |
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWB.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than CIC.TO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWB.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than CIC.TO's 5.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF | 5.25% | 5.72% | 6.71% | 7.37% | 7.64% | 5.48% | 9.56% | 6.16% | 6.61% | 5.68% | 6.72% | 7.31% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 5.02% | 5.38% | 6.66% | 7.62% | 7.30% | 5.46% | 5.80% | 5.53% | 5.59% | 4.80% | 5.04% | 5.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ZWB.TO and CIC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZWB.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWB.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for CIC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for ZWB.TO and 0.87% for CIC.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWB.TO and CIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer