PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while CBNK.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Mulvihill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZWB.TO returned 25.69%/yr vs 38.97%/yr for CBNK.TO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWB.TO achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 25.56% return.

ZWB.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
5.06%
YTD
16.23%
6M
21.03%
1Y
49.97%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
12.24%

CBNK.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
7.74%
YTD
25.56%
6M
32.17%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
38.97%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF		16.23%34.91%19.41%6.67%-14.73%
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		25.56%51.67%27.42%8.42%-19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2022

0.86

The correlation between ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF

Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF

Often compared with ZWB.TO:
ZWB.TO vs. ZEB.TOZWB.TO vs. ZWC.TOZWB.TO vs. VDY.TOZWB.TO vs. VFV.TOZWB.TO vs. XDIV.TOZWB.TO vs. RBNK.TOZWB.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Often compared with CBNK.TO:
CBNK.TO vs. BANK.TOCBNK.TO vs. BKCL.TOCBNK.TO vs. YGOG.NEOCBNK.TO vs. CANY.TOCBNK.TO vs. NXF.TOCBNK.TO vs. ECHI.TOCBNK.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZWB.TO
ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO
CBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZWB.TOCBNK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.44
5.12

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.16
6.76

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.87

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

7.94

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.83

34.25

-5.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is comparable to the CBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZWB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44

5.12

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.10

-0.36

Drawdowns

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZWB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-32.12%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-10.03%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-17.92%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.29%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-10.92%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.32%

-0.58%

Volatility

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) is 4.26%, while Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that ZWB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZWB.TOCBNK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.67%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

13.29%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

15.55%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

17.55%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

17.55%

-1.87%

Dividends

ZWB.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBNK.TO
Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF		5.94%5.86%8.25%9.59%7.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF		5.02%5.38%6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZWB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CBNK.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Mulvihill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWB.TO and CBNK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer