PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVOL vs. XRPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVOL achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly higher than XRPT's -69.02% return.


ZVOL

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
2.14%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*

XRPT

1D
-2.94%
1M
-28.58%
YTD
-69.02%
6M
-79.25%
1Y
-88.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
-2.29%11.63%
XRPT
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF
-69.02%-67.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVOL and XRPT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVOL vs. XRPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XRPT
XRPT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZVOLXRPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.89

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.94

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

-1.26

+2.88

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the XRPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVOL and XRPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZVOLXRPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

-0.59

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.60

+1.03

Drawdowns

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVOL drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum XRPT drawdown of -94.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVOL and XRPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVOLXRPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.25%

-94.78%

+57.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-94.78%

+78.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.17%

-94.78%

+72.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-62.98%

+49.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

70.21%

-65.09%

Volatility

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) is 3.59%, while Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a volatility of 27.96%. This indicates that ZVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVOLXRPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

27.96%

-24.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

105.36%

-92.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

150.67%

-131.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

149.42%

-120.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.27%

149.42%

-120.15%

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVOL has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPT's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVOL vs. XRPT - Dividend Comparison

ZVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.14%, more than XRPT's 5.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XRPT
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF
5.01%1.23%0.00%0.00%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
71.14%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVOL and XRPT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRPT has higher volatility (27.96%) compared to ZVOL (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVOL dropped -37.25% vs XRPT's -94.78%.

On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 8.27% vs -88.64% for XRPT. On fees, XRPT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 8.27% return vs -88.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRPT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 71.14%, compared with 5.01% for XRPT.

ZVOL is categorized as Volatility, while XRPT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZVOL and 0.94% for XRPT.

ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVOL and XRPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer