PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVOL vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVOL achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


ZVOL

1D
-0.12%
1M
6.22%
6M
3.28%
YTD
5.55%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
5.55%-10.71%3.04%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVOL and SBIT is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVOL vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZVOLSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.60

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

5.92

-2.83

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVOL and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVOL drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVOL and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVOLSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.25%

-91.35%

+54.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-47.94%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.92%

-77.15%

+61.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-68.83%

+55.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

21.04%

-15.89%

Volatility

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) is 4.83%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that ZVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVOLSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

22.98%

-18.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

68.89%

-55.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

88.51%

-69.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.93%

96.89%

-67.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.93%

96.89%

-67.96%

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVOL has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVOL vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

ZVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.87%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
69.87%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVOL and SBIT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to ZVOL (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVOL dropped -37.25% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 15.88% for ZVOL. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 69.87%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

ZVOL is categorized as Volatility, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. ZVOL tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid Term Futures Inverse Daily Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZVOL and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVOL and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer