PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVC.TO achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.


ZVC.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
4.99%
YTD
16.23%
6M
18.05%
1Y
43.80%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF
16.23%30.30%15.38%11.07%2.23%31.46%-3.94%10.02%-5.80%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%25.14%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVC.TO and VFV.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018

0.28

The correlation between ZVC.TO and VFV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZVC.TO
VFV.TO

Financial Services

37.6%
11.6%

Energy

19.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

15.5%
1.8%

Industrials

9.9%
8.3%

Technology

8.2%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.9%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Communication Services

0.7%
11.3%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.9%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Financial Services

ZVC.TO
37.6%
VFV.TO
11.6%

Energy

ZVC.TO
19.2%
VFV.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

ZVC.TO
15.5%
VFV.TO
1.8%

Industrials

ZVC.TO
9.9%
VFV.TO
8.3%

Technology

ZVC.TO
8.2%
VFV.TO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZVC.TO
4.2%
VFV.TO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZVC.TO
2.5%
VFV.TO
4.9%

Utilities

ZVC.TO
2.0%
VFV.TO
2.4%

Communication Services

ZVC.TO
0.7%
VFV.TO
11.3%

Real Estate

ZVC.TO
0.2%
VFV.TO
1.9%

Healthcare

ZVC.TO

-

VFV.TO
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVC.TO
ZVC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZVC.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.48

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.20

3.44

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.91

13.10

+22.81

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVC.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZVC.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

2.59

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

1.14

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.14

-0.44

Drawdowns

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVC.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVC.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.00%

-27.43%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-8.62%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-19.05%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-22.19%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.18%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.35%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.26%

-1.04%

Volatility

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVC.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.05%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

8.55%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

11.46%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

14.91%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

16.57%

+0.73%

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVC.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZVC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF
1.95%2.23%2.87%3.32%2.96%2.41%3.30%2.66%2.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVC.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZVC.TO.

ZVC.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. ZVC.TO tracks MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZVC.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVC.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer