PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVC.TO vs. CGVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZVC.TO is traded in CAD, while CGVV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CGVV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVC.TO achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly higher than CGVV's 19.12% return.


ZVC.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
3.69%
6M
19.27%
YTD
20.51%
1Y
46.99%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.72%

CGVV

1D
1.09%
1M
0.09%
6M
12.46%
YTD
19.12%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.65MCA$2.40MCA$2.34M
CA$58.19KCA$60.79KCA$64.38K

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF
20.51%22.84%
CGVV
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
19.12%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVC.TO and CGVV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.54

The correlation between ZVC.TO and CGVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZVC.TO
ZVC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CGVV
CGVV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CGVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CGVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZVC.TOCGVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.33

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

3.14

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.37

11.59

+23.78

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is higher than the CGVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVC.TO and CGVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, which is greater than CGVV's maximum drawdown of -8.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVC.TO and CGVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVC.TOCGVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.00%

-8.88%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-8.88%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.40%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-1.53%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.41%

-1.12%

Volatility

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) is 2.45%, while Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that ZVC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVC.TOCGVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

3.33%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

11.13%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

14.61%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

14.18%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

14.18%

+3.07%

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CGVV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVC.TO vs. CGVV - Dividend Comparison

ZVC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than CGVV's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CGVV
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
0.84%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZVC.TO
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF
1.89%2.23%2.88%3.34%2.98%2.43%3.32%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVC.TO and CGVV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ZVC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ZVC.TO and 0.33% for CGVV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVC.TO and CGVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer