ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZUT.TO (BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds - ZUT.TO tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index while UMVP.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZUT.TO

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 20.31%
• 6M: 17.09%
• 1Y: 25.60%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

UMVP.TO

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZUT.TO BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF	18.62%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUT.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.62

Return for Risk

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUT.TO

ZUT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 65
ZUT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ZUT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ZUT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ZUT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ZUT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZUT.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZUT.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	5.03	-4.45

Drawdowns

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUT.TO and UMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZUT.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-4.57%	-32.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.96%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-0.81%	-5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZUT.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	9.11%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.95%	9.11%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	9.11%	+7.39%

Dividends

ZUT.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than UMVP.TO's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZUT.TO BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF	2.77%	3.44%	3.98%	4.35%	3.95%	3.25%	3.31%	4.00%	4.59%	3.71%	3.98%	4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZUT.TO and UMVP.TO in my portfolio?

ZUT.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between ZUT.TO and UMVP.TO?

ZUT.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index, while UMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Hamilton.