PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZUQ.TO is traded in CAD, while ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZSP-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUQ.TO achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than ZSP-U.TO's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO has outperformed ZSP-U.TO with an annualized return of 16.38%, while ZSP-U.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.53% annualized return.


ZUQ.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
5.91%
YTD
9.39%
6M
3.18%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
16.38%

ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
7.23%
YTD
11.99%
6M
9.98%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
9.39%5.78%34.02%33.24%-18.33%26.40%19.92%31.74%4.70%16.90%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
11.99%11.48%34.63%22.72%-13.06%26.97%15.66%24.09%2.24%13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014

0.79

The correlation between ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUQ.TO
ZUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZUQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.24

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

12.46

-6.59

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZUQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.46

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.10

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.01

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.20

-0.26

Drawdowns

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.94%

-27.34%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-8.83%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-18.89%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.94%

-22.19%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

-27.34%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.20%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-3.51%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.29%

+0.97%

Volatility

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) is 2.31%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that ZUQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZUQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.96%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

8.99%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

11.64%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

14.95%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

16.04%

+1.48%

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUQ.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while ZSP-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.00%0.14%0.71%0.98%1.13%0.91%1.02%1.07%1.26%1.22%1.43%1.29%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
0.43%0.46%0.57%0.86%0.99%0.80%0.96%0.96%1.07%1.16%1.00%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.

ZUQ.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZSP-U.TO is S&P 500. ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index, while ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUQ.TO and 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer