ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO
ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) and COW.TO (iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ZUQ.TO tracks the MSCI USA Quality Index while COW.TO tracks the Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO returned 16.38%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for COW.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZUQ.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for COW.TO.
Performance
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUQ.TO achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than COW.TO's 15.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO has outperformed COW.TO with an annualized return of 16.38%, while COW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
COW.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 15.84% | -0.67% | 5.62% | -8.61% | 12.64% | 19.02% | 11.66% | 25.91% | -14.26% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUQ.TO and COW.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between ZUQ.TO and COW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
-
Healthcare
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
-
Communication Services
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Industrials
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Financial Services
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Basic Materials
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
Energy
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
-
Utilities
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
-
Real Estate
ZUQ.TO
-
COW.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUQ.TO
COW.TO
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZUQ.TO | COW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.12 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.94 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 1.94 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZUQ.TO | COW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.63 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.23 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.45 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.36 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum COW.TO drawdown of -55.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUQ.TO and COW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUQ.TO | COW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -55.00% | +28.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -10.51% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -14.51% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.94% | -29.82% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | -36.62% | +9.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -7.17% | +7.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -13.94% | +9.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 5.06% | -1.80% |
Volatility
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) is 2.31%, while iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that ZUQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUQ.TO | COW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 3.85% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 12.44% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 15.68% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 18.87% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 19.30% | -1.78% |
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUQ.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than COW.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUQ.TO vs. COW.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than COW.TO's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.40% | 1.43% | 1.62% | 2.03% | 0.69% | 1.02% | 1.02% | 1.07% | 0.58% | 1.10% | 1.78% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUQ.TO and COW.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for COW.TO.
ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index, while COW.TO tracks Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUQ.TO and 0.72% for COW.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUQ.TO and COW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer