PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZUB.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZUB.TO is a Financials Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. Over the past 10 years, ZUB.TO returned 11.27%/yr vs 17.02%/yr for ZUQ.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUB.TO achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly lower than ZUQ.TO's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUB.TO has underperformed ZUQ.TO with an annualized return of 11.27%, while ZUQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.

ZUB.TO

1D
-0.56%
1M
7.85%
YTD
9.98%
6M
9.11%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
11.27%

ZUQ.TO

1D
0.91%
1M
4.72%
YTD
14.21%
6M
13.70%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
17.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUB.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF		9.98%20.24%33.07%-6.02%-23.00%39.30%-10.15%33.34%-19.80%17.05%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF		14.21%5.80%34.06%33.29%-18.30%26.45%19.97%31.80%4.75%17.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUB.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF

BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF

Often compared with ZUQ.TO:
ZUQ.TO vs. ZSP.TOZUQ.TO vs. ZGQ.TOZUQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZUQ.TO vs. VGG.TOZUQ.TO vs. XEQT.TOZUQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOZUQ.TO vs. BNKS.L

Return for Risk

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZUB.TO
ZUB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ZUB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO
ZUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZUB.TOZUQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.26
1.75

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.81
2.39

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.07

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

6.71

-2.56

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUB.TO and ZUQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUB.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUB.TO and ZUQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZUB.TOZUQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.05%

-26.93%

-28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.10%

-10.57%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.33%

-17.93%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.97%

-26.93%

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.05%

-26.93%

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-4.55%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

3.25%

+3.04%

Volatility

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 3.96%. This indicates that ZUB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZUB.TOZUQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

3.96%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

9.07%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

12.50%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.92%

16.38%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.16%

17.53%

+12.63%

Dividends

ZUB.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZUB.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF		1.78%1.96%2.29%2.91%2.50%1.88%2.57%2.13%1.92%1.15%1.34%1.42%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF		0.43%0.48%0.60%0.90%1.03%0.83%1.00%1.00%1.12%1.25%1.26%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZUB.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZUB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUB.TO and ZUQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer