ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO).
ZTL.NEO and ZMMK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTL.NEO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2017. ZMMK.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 28, 2021.
Performance
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | 1.49% | -0.43% | -0.21% | 0.46% | -26.25% | -3.79% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.57% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTL.NEO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.57% return.
ZTL.NEO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- -3.56%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -3.96%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZTL.NEO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZTL.NEO
ZMMK.TO
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTL.NEO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | 10.09 | -10.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 25.74 | -26.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 6.01 | -5.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 86.98 | -87.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 406.21 | -406.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTL.NEO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 10.09 | -10.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 10.36 | -10.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTL.NEO and ZMMK.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZTL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | 3.15% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.55% | 3.44% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.55% | 2.75% | 2.82% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.68% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTL.NEO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTL.NEO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.55% | -0.16% | -49.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -0.03% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.71% | 0.00% | -40.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | 0.00% | -23.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 0.01% | +6.73% |
Volatility
ZTL.NEO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that ZTL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZTL.NEO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 0.08% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 0.20% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 0.26% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 0.34% | +16.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 0.34% | +15.60% |