ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO
ZTL.NEO (BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF) and BXF.TO (CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ZTL.NEO returned -4.22%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for BXF.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTL.NEO achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than BXF.TO's 1.25% return.
ZTL.NEO
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | 4.33% | -0.43% | -0.21% | 0.46% | -26.25% | -5.72% | 14.95% | 8.69% | 6.67% | 2.82% |
BXF.TO CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF | 1.25% | 3.86% | 4.51% | 4.55% | -3.73% | -0.83% | 5.07% | 2.36% | 1.77% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTL.NEO and BXF.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2017 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZTL.NEO
BXF.TO
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) and CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF (BXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZTL.NEO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.74 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 5.46 | -3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -49.55%, which is greater than BXF.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTL.NEO and BXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTL.NEO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.55% | -6.99% | -42.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -1.55% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.68% | -1.74% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.89% | -6.92% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.05% | -0.11% | -38.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -1.16% | -22.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 0.51% | +3.66% |
Volatility
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF (BXF.TO) at 0.67%. This indicates that ZTL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZTL.NEO | BXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 0.67% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 2.28% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.77% | 3.06% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 3.55% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 3.61% | +12.19% |
Dividends
ZTL.NEO vs. BXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZTL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than BXF.TO's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXF.TO CI 1-5 Year Laddered Government Strip Bond Index ETF | 2.97% | 2.91% | 3.29% | 2.58% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.67% | 1.75% | 1.55% | 1.17% | 1.19% | 1.24% |
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | 3.09% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.55% | 3.44% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.55% | 2.75% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZTL.NEO and BXF.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI.
Find the right allocation for ZTL.NEO and BXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer