PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSU.TO achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 18.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSU.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 1.62%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.81% annualized return.


ZSU.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
1.62%

ZQQ.TO

1D
1.60%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
18.49%
6M
17.55%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
19.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSU.TO
BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF
-0.19%4.61%3.84%5.18%-6.17%-0.99%4.54%5.57%0.06%1.20%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
18.49%14.59%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.03

The correlation between ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSU.TO
ZSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ZSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSU.TOZQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.72

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

5.44

-2.36

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSU.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-36.39%

+24.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-15.65%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-22.79%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.02%

-36.39%

+26.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

-36.39%

+24.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.39%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-5.46%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

4.94%

-4.39%

Volatility

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) is 0.53%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that ZSU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSU.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

9.57%

-9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

14.82%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56%

18.32%

-15.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

22.94%

-19.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

22.54%

-18.07%

Dividends

ZSU.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than ZQQ.TO's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%
ZSU.TO
BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF
4.31%3.76%3.31%3.17%3.23%2.97%2.99%2.78%2.49%2.30%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZSU.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ZQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSU.TO and ZQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer