ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO
ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZSP.TO is passively managed, while ZLB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO returned 15.98%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for ZLB.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZSP.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZLB.TO.
Performance
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 15.98%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.15% | 12.02% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.53% | 15.61% | 24.69% | 3.24% | 13.54% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 3.14% | 25.29% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSP.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ZSP.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Financial Services
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Communication Services
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Healthcare
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
-
Industrials
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Energy
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
-
Utilities
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Real Estate
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Basic Materials
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSP.TO
ZLB.TO
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSP.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.77 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 10.29 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSP.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.80 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.88 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and ZLB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSP.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -33.96% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -5.36% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -8.01% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -13.00% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | -33.96% | +7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.70% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -2.46% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.45% | +0.84% |
Volatility
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that ZSP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSP.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.47% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 6.38% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 8.29% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 9.44% | +5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 12.15% | +4.21% |
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSP.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than ZLB.TO's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.52% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.44% | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSP.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
ZSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP.TO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and ZLB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer