ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO
ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) and ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO returned 15.98%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for ZAG.TO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO has outperformed ZAG.TO with an annualized return of 15.98%, while ZAG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.66% annualized return.
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.15% | 12.02% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.53% | 15.61% | 24.69% | 3.24% | 13.54% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.84% | 1.12% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2012 | -0.01 |
The correlation between ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Financial Services
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Communication Services
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Healthcare
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Industrials
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Energy
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Utilities
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Real Estate
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
Basic Materials
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSP.TO
ZAG.TO
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSP.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.17 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 2.73 | +9.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSP.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 0.73 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.12 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.23 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.45 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSP.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -18.03% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -2.79% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -5.42% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -15.77% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | -18.03% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.09% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -3.54% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.19% | +1.10% |
Volatility
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that ZSP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSP.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.68% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 3.43% | +5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 4.46% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 6.58% | +8.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 7.11% | +9.25% |
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSP.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than ZAG.TO's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.44% | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
ZSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index.
Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and ZAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer