ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO
ZSP-U.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)) and XUSC.TO (iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSP-U.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XUSC.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 3% Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZSP-U.TO returned 27.09% vs 26.17% for XUSC.TO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZSP-U.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUSC.TO.
Performance
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD, while XUSC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XUSC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZSP-U.TO having a 11.01% return and XUSC.TO slightly higher at 11.42%.
ZSP-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
XUSC.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 26.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZSP-U.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) | 11.01% | 16.84% | 6.26% |
XUSC.TO iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) | 11.42% | 16.73% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and XUSC.TO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and XUSC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSP-U.TO
XUSC.TO
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSP-U.TO | XUSC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.40 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 3.24 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 14.93 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSP-U.TO | XUSC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.23 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.19 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than XUSC.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP-U.TO and XUSC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSP-U.TO | XUSC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -17.78% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -8.11% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.05% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -1.99% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.76% | +0.21% |
Volatility
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) (XUSC.TO) at 2.68%. This indicates that ZSP-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUSC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSP-U.TO | XUSC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.68% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 8.81% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 11.78% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 16.08% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 16.08% | +1.70% |
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSP-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XUSC.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSP-U.TO vs. XUSC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSP-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUSC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSC.TO iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.83% | 0.94% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSP-U.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.26% | 1.22% | 1.43% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ZSP-U.TO and XUSC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XUSC.TO.
ZSP-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XUSC.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XUSC.TO tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO and 0.12% for XUSC.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZSP-U.TO and XUSC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer