PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD, while XQQU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XQQU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP-U.TO achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than XQQU.TO's 20.46% return.


ZSP-U.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.68%
YTD
11.01%
6M
10.70%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
14.74%

XQQU.TO

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.58%
YTD
20.46%
6M
19.23%
1Y
40.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
11.01%16.84%23.97%7.00%
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
20.46%20.69%25.32%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.87

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XQQU.TO
XQQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSP-U.TOXQQU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.43

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.80

13.20

+0.59

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSP-U.TOXQQU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.50

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.49

-0.56

Drawdowns

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than XQQU.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP-U.TOXQQU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-22.84%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-11.76%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.74%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-3.09%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.05%

-1.08%

Volatility

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) is 2.99%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that ZSP-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP-U.TOXQQU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

4.57%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

12.28%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

16.11%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

20.26%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

20.26%

-2.48%

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQU.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSP-U.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSP-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.21%0.26%0.20%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.00%0.14%0.71%0.98%1.13%0.91%1.02%1.07%1.26%1.22%1.43%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQU.TO.

ZSP-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while XQQU.TO is Nasdaq-100. ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO and 0.39% for XQQU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP-U.TO and XQQU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer