PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP-U.TO achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP-U.TO has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 14.67%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.35% annualized return.


ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.54%
6M
7.86%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
14.67%

VTV

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.34%
6M
11.01%
YTD
15.30%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
9.40%17.73%24.40%26.04%-18.51%28.46%18.41%30.99%-5.39%21.42%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
15.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and VTV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.71

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSP-U.TOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.96

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

15.00

-5.58

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP-U.TO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP-U.TO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP-U.TOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-59.27%

+25.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-6.35%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-14.52%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-17.04%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-36.78%

+3.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.75%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-7.83%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.67%

+0.40%

Volatility

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.70%. This indicates that ZSP-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP-U.TOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.70%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

7.77%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

10.31%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

13.85%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.61%

+0.88%

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSP-U.TO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

ZSP-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VTV's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.88%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.81%0.85%1.04%1.38%1.55%1.15%1.57%1.41%1.67%1.58%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSP-U.TO and VTV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO.

ZSP-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO and 0.04% for VTV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP-U.TO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer