ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).
ZSML.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZSML.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2020. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.
Performance
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 4.62% | 0.20% | 17.47% | 12.67% | -11.12% | 28.32% | 6.20% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.42% | 20.31% | 15.20% | 9.29% | -0.46% | 22.81% | -4.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 1.42% return.
ZSML.TO
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSML.TO
ZLB.TO
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSML.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.48 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.99 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.57 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 8.71 | -4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSML.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.48 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 1.22 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.12 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSML.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than ZLB.TO's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.47% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.92% | 1.93% | 2.28% | 2.56% | 2.56% | 2.29% | 2.72% | 2.34% | 2.65% | 2.42% | 2.82% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, roughly equal to the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and ZLB.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSML.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -33.96% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -6.53% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.87% | -13.04% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -3.08% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -2.51% | -6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 1.93% | +2.02% |
Volatility
ZSML.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 3.64%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZSML.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.64% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 7.64% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 10.52% | +12.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 9.57% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 12.19% | +10.22% |